Suppr超能文献

探讨不同剂量清肺大院颗粒的效用:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Exploration of the utility of different doses of Qingfei Dayuan granules: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Feb 26;16(5):4503-4517. doi: 10.18632/aging.205601.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have confirmed that Qingfei Dayuan (QFDY) granules are effective in the treatment of influenza and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) caused by pulmonary heat-toxin syndrome (PHTS). Granules of Chinese medicine formulations have become a widely used dosage form in clinical practice. With the continuous optimization of extraction technology, the advantages of Chinese medicine granules have been gradually demonstrated, but the price of Chinese medicine granules is generally higher than that of traditional dosage forms of Chinese medicine, and we support the rational use of the appropriate dosage of QFDY for patients with these conditions. Therefore, we set up half of the conventional dose as the low dose group, and designed the three-arm study to rigorously compare the efficacy difference of low-dose QFDY, QFDY and the placebo group, with the expectation of providing scientific support for the rational selection of the dose and the safe and effective use of the medicine in clinical practice.

METHODS

We recruited 108 patients with clinical diagnoses of influenza and URTIs caused by PHTS to receive treatment at six hospitals in Hubei, China. Using a centralized randomization system, patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio to the QFDY, low-dose QFDY, or placebo control groups to receive the corresponding drug, and the study physicians, subjects, outcome assessors, and statisticians were unaware of group assignments. The primary outcome was the time to complete fever relief. Secondary outcomes included the efficacy of Chinese medicine in alleviating signs and symptoms and the disappearance rate of individual symptoms. Adverse events were monitored throughout the trial.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were recruited. A total of 106 patients were included in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in baseline of the three groups before treatment (P > 0.05). 1. Regarding the median time to complete fever relief, the QFDY, low-dose QFDY and placebo groups had median times of 26 h, 40 h and 48 h, respectively. The QFDY group had a shorter time to complete fever relief than the placebo group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), while the low-dose QFDY group had a shorter time than the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). 2. In terms of the total efficacy of Chinese medicine in alleviating symptoms at the end of three full days of treatment, as well as the cure rate of red and sore throat, stuffy and runny nose, and sneezing, QFDY and low-dose QFDY were superior to the placebo, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no statistical significance in the comparison between the QFDY group and the low-dose QFDY group (P > 0.05). 3. In terms of the headache cure rate after three full days of treatment, QFDY was superior to the placebo, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), and there was no significant efficacy of low-dose QFDY. 4. Safety comparisons showed no serious adverse events and 30 minor adverse events, which were not clinically considered to be related to the drug and were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of patients with influenza and URTIs caused by PHTS, which are mainly characterized by clinical symptoms such as red and sore throat, stuffy and runny nose, and sneezing, when fever is not obvious or low-grade fever is present, the use of low-dose QFDY to simply alleviate the clinical symptoms is recommended and preferred. Moreover, with its good safety profile, QFDY can be used in the treatment of patients with influenza and URTIs caused by PHTS, which can effectively shorten the duration of fever, significantly increase the total efficacy of Chinese medicine in alleviating symptoms after 3 days of treatment, and accelerate the recovery of symptoms such as red and sore throat, stuffy and runny nose, sneezing, and headache, etc. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn.

TRIAL NUMBER

ChiCTR2100043449. Registered on 18 February 2021.

摘要

背景

临床研究证实,清肺达原颗粒(QFDY)在治疗肺热证(PHTS)引起的流感和上呼吸道感染(URTIs)方面具有疗效。中药配方颗粒已成为临床实践中广泛应用的一种剂型。随着提取技术的不断优化,中药颗粒的优势逐渐显现,但中药颗粒的价格普遍高于传统中药剂型,我们支持对这些病症的患者合理使用 QFDY 的适当剂量。因此,我们将常规剂量的一半设定为低剂量组,并设计了三臂研究,严格比较低剂量 QFDY、QFDY 和安慰剂组的疗效差异,期望为合理选择剂量和安全有效地在临床实践中使用药物提供科学依据。

方法

我们在湖北的六家医院招募了 108 名临床诊断为 PHTS 引起的流感和 URTIs 的患者进行治疗。使用集中随机化系统,患者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至 QFDY、低剂量 QFDY 或安慰剂对照组接受相应的药物治疗,研究医生、患者、结局评估者和统计人员均不知道分组情况。主要结局是退热完成时间。次要结局包括中药缓解症状的疗效和个别症状消失率。整个试验过程中监测不良事件。

结果

共招募了 108 名患者。共有 106 名患者纳入全分析集(FAS)。在 FAS 分析中,三组患者在治疗前的基线水平无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。1. 关于退热完成时间的中位数,QFDY、低剂量 QFDY 和安慰剂组的中位数分别为 26 小时、40 小时和 48 小时。QFDY 组退热完成时间短于安慰剂组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而低剂量 QFDY 组退热完成时间短于安慰剂组,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。2. 治疗三天后,中药整体疗效缓解症状的总有效率以及缓解咽痛、鼻塞流涕、喷嚏的痊愈率,QFDY 和低剂量 QFDY 均优于安慰剂,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。QFDY 组与低剂量 QFDY 组之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。3. 治疗三天后头痛的痊愈率,QFDY 优于安慰剂,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而低剂量 QFDY 无明显疗效。4. 安全性比较显示,无严重不良事件和 30 例轻微不良事件,临床不认为与药物有关,且无统计学意义。

结论

在治疗以咽痛、鼻塞流涕、喷嚏为主要临床症状的流感和 URTIs 患者中,当发热不明显或低热时,推荐并优先使用低剂量 QFDY 简单缓解临床症状。此外,QFDY 具有良好的安全性,可用于治疗肺热证引起的流感和 URTIs,可有效缩短发热持续时间,显著提高治疗后 3 天的中药整体疗效,加速咽痛、鼻塞流涕、喷嚏、头痛等症状的恢复。临床试验注册:http://www.chictr.org.cn。

注册号

ChiCTR2100043449。于 2021 年 2 月 18 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a15/10968682/d29fb24b4bad/aging-16-205601-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验