Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jan;30(1):73-89. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000584.
This article explores how the law of England and Wales1 has responded thus far to medical and clinical advances that have enabled patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness to survive. The authors argue that, although the courts have taken account of much of the science, they are now lagging behind, with the result that some patients are being denied their legal rights under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The article further argues that English law does not comply with the United Kingdom's commitments under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Stressing the need for the law to keep in step with advances in science, the article concludes with robust recommendations for improvements, based on the latest research in neuroscience, to the way in which life-sustaining treatment decisions are made. This would mean that the wishes of patients, including those with covert awareness, can be better reflected in best interests assessments.
本文探讨了英格兰和威尔士的法律迄今为止如何应对使长期意识障碍患者能够存活的医学和临床进步。作者认为,尽管法院已经考虑到了很多科学,但他们现在已经落后了,结果是一些患者被剥夺了他们根据《2005 年精神能力法》享有的合法权利。文章进一步认为,英国法律不符合联合王国根据《联合国残疾人权利公约》作出的承诺。本文强调法律必须跟上科学进步的步伐,根据神经科学的最新研究,就维持生命的治疗决策的方式提出了切实可行的改进建议,这将意味着可以更好地反映有自主意识的患者的意愿,使其在最佳利益评估中得到体现。