Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; and
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; and.
Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-009191.
Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for adolescents exhibiting co-occurring substance use and mental health problems may improve outcomes and have long-lasting effects. This study examined the relationship between access to SBIRT and substance use, depression and medical diagnoses, and health services use at 1 and 3 years postscreening for such adolescents.
The study draws from a cluster-randomized trial comparing SBIRT to usual care (UC) for adolescents endorsing past-year substance use and recent mood symptoms during visits to a general pediatrics clinic between November 1, 2011, and October 31, 2013, in a large, integrated health system ( = 1851); this sample examined the subset of adolescents endorsing both problems ( = 289). Outcomes included depression, substance use and medical diagnoses, and emergency department and outpatient visits 1 and 3 years later.
The SBIRT group had lower odds of depression diagnoses at 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.87) and 3 years (OR = 0.51; CI = 0.28-0.94) compared with the UC group. At 3 years, the SBIRT group had lower odds of a substance use diagnosis (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.23-0.92), and fewer emergency department visits (rate ratio = 0.65; CI = 0.44-0.97) than UC group.
The findings suggest that SBIRT may prevent health complications and avert costly services use among adolescents with both mental health and substance use problems. As SBIRT is implemented widely in pediatric primary care, training pediatricians to discuss substance use and mental health problems can translate to positive outcomes for these vulnerable adolescents.
对同时存在物质使用和心理健康问题的青少年进行筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT),可能会改善预后并产生长期效果。本研究旨在探讨青少年在接受一般儿科诊所就诊时,报告过去一年物质使用和近期情绪症状后,接受 SBIRT 和常规护理(UC)的情况下,1 年和 3 年后 SBIRT 获得情况与物质使用、抑郁和医疗诊断以及卫生服务使用之间的关系。
本研究采用了一项集群随机试验,对 2011 年 11 月 1 日至 2013 年 10 月 31 日期间在大型综合性卫生系统的一般儿科诊所就诊的青少年(n=1851)进行了 SBIRT 与 UC 的比较,该研究纳入了过去一年有物质使用且近期有情绪症状的青少年;该样本中同时存在这两种问题的青少年(n=289)被纳入本研究。结局指标包括抑郁、物质使用和医疗诊断,以及 1 年和 3 年后的急诊和门诊就诊情况。
与 UC 组相比,SBIRT 组在 1 年(比值比[OR] = 0.31;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.11-0.87)和 3 年(OR = 0.51;95%CI = 0.28-0.94)时出现抑郁诊断的可能性较低。在 3 年时,SBIRT 组出现物质使用诊断的可能性(OR = 0.46;95%CI = 0.23-0.92)和急诊就诊次数(率比[RR] = 0.65;95%CI = 0.44-0.97)均低于 UC 组。
这些发现表明,SBIRT 可能会预防青少年心理健康和物质使用问题出现健康并发症,并避免昂贵的服务使用。随着 SBIRT 在儿科初级保健中广泛实施,培训儿科医生讨论物质使用和心理健康问题可以为这些弱势群体青少年带来积极的结果。