Liu Qi, Lu Xing-Lin, Zeng Peng, Yu Shi
Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China.
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Ecological Environmental Monitoring Centre of Liuzhou, Liuzhou 545001, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Jan 8;42(1):65-74. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202004006.
The objective was to investigate the characteristics and sources of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the karst region in southwestern China. We monitored atmospheric VOCs in Liuzhou by the GC955 VOCs Online Monitoring System and analyzed the pollution characteristics, ozone formation potential (OFP), aerosol formation potential (AFP), and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model in March 2019. The results show that ① 50 kinds of VOC components were detected during the supervised period, with an average daily concentration of 25.52×10 mol·mol, which was composed of alkanes (56.08%), alkenes (19.63%), alkynes (14.25%), and aromatics (10.04%), respectively. ② The concentration of VOCs was lower during the day and higher at night, with the highest value at 23:00. The VOC concentration was low in daytime and high at night. The peak value of VOCs with regard to diurnal variation was correlated with the time of morning and the evening traffic peak and may be influenced by various factors. ③ The contribution of alkenes, aromatics, and alkanes to OFP was 44.30%, 33.03%, and 19.96%, respectively. This indicates that the control of aromatic and olefin should prioritize alkanes. In addition, Liuzhou city is in the VOC sensitive area of O generation, and the reduction of VOCs had a controlling effect on O generation. ④ The contribution of aromatic hydrocarbons to AFP was up to 95.27%. Therefore, the improvement and control of the processes in motor vehicle exhaust emissions, solvent use, and the automobile industry and the chemical industry could effectively suppress ozone and haze pollution. ⑤ The emission sources of VOCs in spring were mainly industrial emission sources (28.34%), motor vehicle sources (25.47%), combustion sources (24.37%), solvent sources (13.28%), and plant emission sources (8.54%), respectively. This indicates that the control of industrial emission sources, motor vehicle sources, and combustion sources is the main way to control VOC pollution in Liuzhou City. Meanwhile, the olefin and aromatic hydrocarbons emitted by these emission sources should be mainly considered.
目的是调查中国西南部喀斯特地区环境挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的特征和来源。我们于2019年3月通过GC955 VOCs在线监测系统对柳州市的大气VOCs进行了监测,并分析了其污染特征、臭氧生成潜势(OFP)、气溶胶生成潜势(AFP)以及正矩阵因子分解(PMF)模型。结果表明:①监测期间共检测出50种VOC组分,日均浓度为25.52×10⁻⁹mol·mol⁻¹,其组成分别为烷烃(56.08%)、烯烃(19.63%)、炔烃(14.25%)和芳烃(10.04%)。②VOCs浓度白天较低,夜间较高,在23:00达到最高值。VOC浓度白天低夜间高。VOCs日变化峰值与早晚交通高峰时间相关,可能受多种因素影响。③烯烃、芳烃和烷烃对OFP的贡献分别为44.30%、33.03%和19.96%。这表明控制芳烃和烯烃应优先考虑烷烃。此外,柳州市处于O生成的VOC敏感区,VOCs的减少对O生成有控制作用。④芳烃对AFP的贡献高达95.27%。因此,改进和控制机动车尾气排放、溶剂使用以及汽车工业和化学工业中的工艺,可有效抑制臭氧和雾霾污染。⑤春季VOCs的排放源主要分别为工业排放源(28.34%)、机动车源(25.47%)、燃烧源(24.37%)、溶剂源(13.28%)和植物排放源(8.54%)。这表明控制工业排放源、机动车源和燃烧源是控制柳州市VOC污染的主要途径。同时,应主要考虑这些排放源排放的烯烃和芳烃。