Hidayat Muhamad Taufik, Lawn Sharon, Muir-Cochrane Eimear, Oster Candice
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
West Java Psychiatric Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Dec 7;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00424-0.
Pasung is the term used in Indonesia and a number of other countries for seclusion and restraint of people with mental illness in the community, usually at home by their family. While pasung has been banned because it is contrary to human rights, its practice continues to exist within the community, particularly where community mental health services are limited, and in the absence of adequate social support, and pervasive negatives beliefs about mental illness. It is essential to understand the reasons for the ongoing use of pasung and to examine potential solutions.
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed international literature was conducted to identify the socio-cultural contexts for pasung use, and interventions to address it. The analysis draws on the socio-ecological framework, which focused on relationships between the individual and their environment.
Fifty published articles were included in the review; all studies were conducted in Asia and Africa, with 32 undertaken in Indonesia. Most studies were qualitative (n = 21). Others included one case-control study, one cross-sectional study, and seven surveys; only four studies examined the application of an intervention, and each used a pre and post methodology. Of these, two studies tested psychoeducational interventions which aimed to overcome family burden due to pasung, and each suggested a community mental health approach. The remaining two studies evaluated the intervention of 'unlocking'; one study used a community-based culturally sensitive approach, and the other used a community-based rehabilitation program. Reasons for pasung given by family appear to be as a last resort and in the absence of other supports to help them care for the person with severe mental illness.
The findings highlight that a mixture of individual, interpersonal, community and policy interventions are needed to reduce the use of pasung. While consumer and carer involvement as part of a socio-ecological approach is understood to be effective in reducing pasung, an understanding of how to elaborate this in the management of pasung remains elusive. Review Registration CRD42020157543: CRD.
“帕松”(pasung)一词在印度尼西亚和其他一些国家用于指在社区中对精神疾病患者进行隔离和约束,通常是由其家人在家中实施。尽管“帕松”因违反人权已被禁止,但其做法在社区中仍然存在,特别是在社区精神卫生服务有限、缺乏足够社会支持以及存在对精神疾病普遍负面看法的地方。了解“帕松”持续存在的原因并研究潜在解决方案至关重要。
对同行评审的国际文献进行系统综述和叙述性综合分析,以确定使用“帕松”的社会文化背景以及应对措施。分析借鉴了社会生态框架,该框架关注个体与其环境之间的关系。
该综述纳入了50篇已发表的文章;所有研究均在亚洲和非洲进行,其中32项在印度尼西亚开展。大多数研究是定性研究(n = 21)。其他研究包括一项病例对照研究、一项横断面研究和七项调查;只有四项研究考察了干预措施的应用,且每项研究都采用了前后对比方法。其中,两项研究测试了心理教育干预措施,旨在克服因“帕松”造成的家庭负担,且每项研究都提出了社区精神卫生方法。其余两项研究评估了“解除约束”干预措施;一项研究采用了基于社区的文化敏感方法,另一项研究采用了基于社区的康复计划。家人给出的使用“帕松”的原因似乎是作为最后手段,且在没有其他支持来帮助他们照顾重度精神疾病患者的情况下。
研究结果表明,需要综合个体、人际、社区和政策干预措施来减少“帕松”的使用。虽然作为社会生态方法一部分的消费者和照顾者参与被认为在减少“帕松”使用方面有效,但对于如何在“帕松”管理中详细阐述这一点仍难以捉摸。综述注册编号:CRD42020157543:CRD。