Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e235-e246. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004784.
We obtained preliminary evidence on the efficacy of early prophylaxis on the risk of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis and its effect on thrombin generation in critically ill children.
Bayesian phase 2b randomized clinical trial.
Seven PICUs.
Children less than 18 years old with a newly inserted central venous catheter and at low risk of bleeding.
Enoxaparin adjusted to anti-Xa level of 0.2-0.5 international units/mL started at less than 24 hours after insertion of central venous catheter (enoxaparin arm) versus usual care without placebo (usual care arm).
At the interim analysis, the proportion of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis on ultrasonography in the usual care arm, which was 54.2% of 24 children, was significantly higher than that previously reported. This resulted in misspecification of the preapproved Bayesian analysis, reversal of direction of treatment effect, and early termination of the randomized clinical trial. Nevertheless, with 30.4% of 23 children with central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis on ultrasonography in the enoxaparin arm, risk ratio of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was 0.55 (95% credible interval, 0.24-1.11). Including children without ultrasonography, clinically relevant central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis developed in one of 27 children (3.7%) in the enoxaparin arm and seven of 24 (29.2%) in the usual care arm (p = 0.02). Clinically relevant bleeding developed in one child randomized to the enoxaparin arm. Response profile of endogenous thrombin potential, a measure of thrombin generation, was not statistically different between trial arms.
These findings suggest the efficacy and safety of early prophylaxis that should be validated in a pivotal randomized clinical trial.
我们获得了早期预防在危重症儿童中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成风险和对凝血酶生成影响方面的疗效的初步证据。
贝叶斯 2b 期随机临床试验。
7 个 PICUs。
年龄小于 18 岁、新插入中心静脉导管且出血风险低的儿童。
在中心静脉导管插入后不到 24 小时,调整依诺肝素抗 Xa 水平至 0.2-0.5 国际单位/毫升(依诺肝素组),与未使用安慰剂的常规治疗(常规治疗组)相比。
在中期分析中,常规治疗组 24 名儿童中有 54.2%的超声检查显示中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成,这一比例明显高于先前报道。这导致预批准的贝叶斯分析不精确,治疗效果方向逆转,以及随机临床试验提前终止。尽管如此,在依诺肝素组中,有 23 名儿童中有 30.4%的超声检查显示中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成,中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成的风险比为 0.55(95%可信区间,0.24-1.11)。包括未进行超声检查的儿童,在依诺肝素组中有 1 名(3.7%)儿童和常规治疗组中有 7 名(29.2%)儿童发生临床相关的中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成(p=0.02)。有 1 名随机分配至依诺肝素组的儿童发生临床相关出血。内源凝血酶潜能(凝血酶生成的一种测量方法)的反应谱在试验组之间无统计学差异。
这些发现提示早期预防有效且安全,应在一项关键性随机临床试验中得到验证。