Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 1;49(4):e369-e380. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004848.
We explored the age-dependent heterogeneity in the efficacy of prophylaxis with enoxaparin against central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis in critically ill children.
Post hoc analysis of a Bayesian phase 2b randomized clinical trial.
Seven PICUs.
Children less than 18 years old with newly inserted central venous catheter.
Enoxaparin started less than 24 hours after insertion of central venous catheter and adjusted to anti-Xa level of 0.2-0.5 international units/mL versus usual care.
Of 51 children randomized, 24 were infants less than 1 year old. Risk ratios of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis with prophylaxis with enoxaparin were 0.98 (95% credible interval, 0.37-2.44) in infants and 0.24 (95% credible interval, 0.04-0.82) in older children greater than or equal to 1 year old. Infants and older children achieved anti-Xa level greater than or equal to 0.2 international units/mL at comparable times. While central venous catheter was in situ, endogenous thrombin potential, a measure of thrombin generation, was 223.21 nM.min (95% CI, 8.78-437.64 nM.min) lower in infants. Factor VIII activity, a driver of thrombin generation, was also lower in infants by 45.1% (95% CI, 15.7-74.4%). Median minimum platelet count while central venous catheter was in situ was higher in infants by 39 × 103/mm3 (interquartile range, 17-61 × 103/mm3). Central venous catheter:vein ratio was not statistically different. Prophylaxis with enoxaparin was less efficacious against central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis at lower factor VIII activity and at higher platelet count.
The relatively lesser contribution of thrombin generation on central venous catheter-associated thrombus formation in critically ill infants potentially explains the age-dependent heterogeneity in the efficacy of prophylaxis with enoxaparin.
我们探讨了依诺肝素预防危重症儿童中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成的疗效在年龄依赖性方面的异质性。
贝叶斯 2b 期随机临床试验的事后分析。
7 个 PICUs。
年龄小于 18 岁且新插入中心静脉导管的患者。
在插入中心静脉导管后不到 24 小时内开始使用依诺肝素,并将抗 Xa 水平调整至 0.2-0.5 国际单位/mL,与常规治疗相比。
在随机分配的 51 名患儿中,有 24 名是年龄小于 1 岁的婴儿。用依诺肝素预防的中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成的风险比为婴儿 0.98(95%可信区间,0.37-2.44),年龄大于或等于 1 岁的儿童为 0.24(95%可信区间,0.04-0.82)。婴儿和年龄较大的儿童在可比的时间内达到了抗 Xa 水平大于或等于 0.2 国际单位/mL。当中心静脉导管在位时,凝血酶生成的一种测量方法——内源性凝血酶潜能(endogenous thrombin potential),在婴儿中低 223.21 nM.min(95%置信区间,8.78-437.64 nM.min)。凝血酶生成的驱动因子 VIII 活性在婴儿中也低 45.1%(95%置信区间,15.7-74.4%)。当中心静脉导管在位时,血小板计数的中位数在婴儿中高 39×103/mm3(四分位距,17-61×103/mm3)。中心静脉导管与静脉的比值在统计学上没有差异。当因子 VIII 活性较低和血小板计数较高时,依诺肝素预防与中心静脉导管相关的深静脉血栓形成的疗效较差。
在危重症婴儿中,凝血酶生成对中心静脉导管相关血栓形成的相对较小的贡献可能解释了依诺肝素预防的疗效在年龄依赖性方面的异质性。