United Nations University-MERIT, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244428. eCollection 2020.
Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) is frequently used as an indicator of financial protection. CHE exists when health expenditure exceeds a certain threshold of household consumption. Although CHE is reported to have declined in Kenya, it is still unacceptably high and disproportionately affects the poor. This study examines the socioeconomic factors that contribute to inequalities in CHE as well as the change in these inequalities over time in Kenya.
We used data from the Kenya household health expenditure and utilisation (KHHEUS) surveys in 2007 and 2013. The concertation index was used to measure the socioeconomic inequalities in CHE. Using the Wagstaff (2003) approach, we decomposed the concentration index of CHE to assess the relative contribution of its determinants. We applied Oaxaca-type decomposition to assess the change in CHE inequalities over time and the factors that explain it.
The findings show that while there was a decline in the incidence of CHE, inequalities in CHE increased from -0.271 to -0.376 and was disproportionately concentrated amongst the less well-off. Higher wealth quintiles and employed household heads positively contributed to the inequalities in CHE, suggesting that they disadvantaged the poor. The rise in CHE inequalities overtime was explained mainly by the changes in the elasticities of the household wealth status.
Inequalities in CHE are persistent in Kenya and are largely driven by the socioeconomic status of the households. This implies that the existing financial risk protection mechanisms have not been sufficient in cushioning the most vulnerable from the financial burden of healthcare payments. Understanding the factors that sustain inequalities in CHE is, therefore, paramount in shaping pro-poor interventions that not only protect the poor from financial hardship but also reduce overall socioeconomic inequalities. This underscores the fundamental need for a multi-sectoral approach to broadly address existing socioeconomic inequalities.
灾难性卫生支出(CHE)常被用作财务保护的指标。当卫生支出超过家庭消费的某一特定阈值时,就会出现 CHE。尽管肯尼亚报告 CHE 有所下降,但仍高得令人无法接受,且不成比例地影响穷人。本研究考察了导致 CHE 不平等的社会经济因素,以及肯尼亚 CHE 不平等随时间的变化。
我们使用了 2007 年和 2013 年肯尼亚家庭卫生支出和利用调查(KHHEUS)的数据。集中指数用于衡量 CHE 的社会经济不平等。我们采用 Wagstaff(2003)方法,对 CHE 的集中指数进行分解,以评估其决定因素的相对贡献。我们应用 Oaxaca 型分解来评估 CHE 不平等随时间的变化及其解释因素。
研究结果表明,虽然 CHE 的发生率有所下降,但 CHE 的不平等程度从-0.271 增加到-0.376,且不成比例地集中在不太富裕的人群中。较高的财富五分位数和有工作的家庭户主对 CHE 的不平等有积极贡献,这表明他们使穷人处于不利地位。 CHE 不平等随时间的上升主要归因于家庭财富状况弹性的变化。
肯尼亚的 CHE 不平等现象持续存在,主要由家庭的社会经济地位驱动。这意味着,现有的财务风险保护机制在减轻最脆弱人群的医疗保健支付的财务负担方面还不够充分。因此,了解维持 CHE 不平等的因素对于制定有利于穷人的干预措施至关重要,这些干预措施不仅可以保护穷人免受经济困难的影响,还可以减少整体社会经济不平等。这突显了采取多部门办法广泛解决现有社会经济不平等的根本必要性。