Mussa Richard
Department of Economics, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, Box 280, Zomba, Malawi.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Jun;16(2):163-174. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9184-y. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
This paper proposes three measures of average exit time from catastrophic health payments; the first measure is non-normative in that the weights placed on catastrophic payments incurred by poor and nonpoor households are the same. It ignores the fact that the opportunity cost of health spending is different between poor and nonpoor households. The other two measures allow for distribution sensitivity but differ in their conceptualization of inequality; one is based on socioeconomic inequalities in catastrophic health payments, and the other uses pure inequalities in catastrophic health payments. The proposed measures are then applied to Malawian data from the Third Integrated Household Survey. The empirical results show that when the threshold of pre-payment income is increased from 5 to 15 %, the average exit time decreases from 2.1 to 0.2 years; and as the catastrophic threshold rises from 10 to 40 % of ability to pay, the average exit time falls from 3.6 to 0.1 years. It is found that adjusting for socioeconomic inequality leads to small changes in the exit times, however, using pure inequality leads to large reductions in the exit time.
本文提出了三种衡量灾难性医疗支出平均退出时间的方法;第一种方法不具有规范性,因为对贫困家庭和非贫困家庭发生的灾难性支出所赋予的权重相同。它忽略了一个事实,即贫困家庭和非贫困家庭的医疗支出机会成本是不同的。另外两种方法考虑了分配敏感性,但在不平等的概念化方面有所不同;一种基于灾难性医疗支出中的社会经济不平等,另一种使用灾难性医疗支出中的纯粹不平等。然后将所提出的方法应用于第三次综合住户调查中的马拉维数据。实证结果表明,当预付收入阈值从5%提高到15%时,平均退出时间从2.1年降至0.2年;随着灾难性阈值从支付能力的10%提高到40%,平均退出时间从3.6年降至0.1年。研究发现,调整社会经济不平等会使退出时间有小的变化,然而,使用纯粹不平等会使退出时间大幅减少。