Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
J Clin Apher. 2021 Jun;36(3):465-469. doi: 10.1002/jca.21869. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
The venerable clinical case report has been largely reduced to the status of commodity in the present age of dedicated case report journals. Top-line clinical journals may discourage or even refuse to accept clinical case reports due to their potential adverse effect on the impact factor of the journal. But while the traditional clinical case report, that presents a case history and attempts to extrapolate a lesson from it, may have fallen out of favor, there remains a need for astute clinical observations that serve to stimulate the generation of hypotheses and may lead, ultimately, to medical breakthroughs. Clinicians are very much capable of employing scientific reasoning when approaching an unusual clinical situation. By remaining up to date with the literature, and determining, at the outset of the case, what lessons may be learned from it, they can formulate a scientific approach, using clinical methods, to result in meaningful contributions to the literature in top-line journals.
在当今时代,专门的病例报告期刊使得备受尊敬的临床病例报告在很大程度上沦为了一种商品。由于潜在的负面影响,顶级临床期刊可能会阻止甚至拒绝接受临床病例报告,这种负面影响可能会降低期刊的影响因子。但是,尽管传统的临床病例报告,即呈现病例历史并试图从中推断出一个教训,可能已经不受欢迎,但仍然需要敏锐的临床观察,以激发假设的产生,并最终导致医学突破。当面临不寻常的临床情况时,临床医生非常有能力运用科学推理。通过及时了解文献,并在病例开始时确定可以从中吸取哪些教训,他们可以制定一种科学的方法,使用临床方法,为顶级期刊的文献做出有意义的贡献。