Walther Bernd, Geduhn Anke, Schenke Detlef, Jacob Jens
Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Horticulture and Forests, Vertebrate Research, Toppheideweg 88, 48161 Münster, Germany.
Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Horticulture and Forests, Vertebrate Research, Toppheideweg 88, 48161 Münster, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 25;762:144160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144160. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The exposure of non-target wildlife to anticoagulant compounds used for rodent control is a well-known phenomenon. Exposure can be primary when non-target species consume bait or secondary via uptake of poisoned animals by mammalian and avian predators. However, nothing is known about the exposure patterns in passerine birds that are commonly present on farms where rodent control is conducted. We used liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry to screen for residues of anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) in liver tissue of passerine birds that were present during rodent control with a product containing brodifacoum (BR). The 222 birds of 13 species were bycatch of rodent snap trapping in 2011-2013 on 11 livestock farms run synchronously with baiting. During baiting, ARs were detected in about 30% of birds; 28% carried BR. In liver tissue of 54 birds that carried BR, concentrations ranged from 4 to 7809 ng/g (mean 490 ± 169 ng/g). Among common bird species with AR residues, BR was most prevalent in robins (Erithacus rubecula) (44%) and dunnocks (Prunella modularis) (41%). Mean BR concentration was highest in great tits (Parus major) (902 ± 405 ng/g). The occurrence and concentrations of BR residues were about 30% higher in birds collected close to bait stations compared to birds collected further away. The results demonstrate that several ground feeding songbird species are exposed to ARs used on farms. If BR was present in liver tissue, concentrations were variable, which may imply a combination of primary and secondary exposure of songbirds. Exposure was mostly restricted to the immediate surroundings of farms where bait was used, which might limit the transfer to the wider environment. Efforts should be made to reduce the access for birds to AR bait to prevent high exposure.
非靶标野生动物接触用于灭鼠的抗凝血化合物是一种众所周知的现象。当非靶标物种食用诱饵时,接触可能是直接的;或者通过哺乳动物和鸟类捕食者摄取中毒动物而产生间接接触。然而,对于在进行灭鼠的农场中常见的雀形目鸟类的接触模式,我们却一无所知。我们使用液相色谱-串联质谱法,对在使用含有溴敌隆(BR)的产品进行灭鼠期间出现的雀形目鸟类肝脏组织中的抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)残留进行了筛查。2011年至2013年期间,在11个与投饵同步进行的畜牧场中,通过鼠夹诱捕捕获了13种222只鸟类,这些鸟类均为误捕。在投饵期间,约30%的鸟类检测到ARs;28%的鸟类携带BR。在携带BR的54只鸟类的肝脏组织中,浓度范围为4至7809纳克/克(平均490±169纳克/克)。在含有AR残留的常见鸟类物种中,BR在知更鸟(欧亚鸲)(44%)和鹪鹩(歌带鹀)(41%)中最为普遍。大山雀(大山雀)的平均BR浓度最高(902±405纳克/克)。与距离较远的鸟类相比,在靠近诱饵站收集的鸟类中,BR残留的发生率和浓度高出约30%。结果表明,几种地面取食的鸣禽物种接触到了农场使用的ARs。如果肝脏组织中存在BR,浓度则各不相同,这可能意味着鸣禽存在直接和间接接触的综合情况。接触大多局限于使用诱饵的农场周边地区,这可能会限制其向更广泛环境的转移。应努力减少鸟类接触AR诱饵的机会,以防止高剂量接触。