Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered as a risk factor for endograft limb thrombosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of narrow aortic bifurcation on outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
A systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched electronic bibliographic databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients with NAB versus those with regular aortic bifurcation. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and those of continuous outcomes using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for expected heterogeneity, the random-effects model was applied for statistical analysis.
Six observational studies were included, reporting a total of 2,673 patients (412 with NAR and 2,261 with friendly anatomy). Perioperative mortality was similar between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.30-4.34, P = 0.85, I = 0%). Limb stenosis and kinking requiring additional intraoperative procedures was significantly more common among patients with NAB (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.16-4.22, P < 0.00001, I = 0%). Nevertheless, 30-day reintervention rate was similar between the groups, as was the rate of limb occlusion during follow-up.
Available evidence suggests that at the expense of significantly more intraoperative additional procedures, EVAR with bifurcated devices can be safely performed in patients with NAB.
窄分叉主动脉(NAB)被认为是移植物内血栓形成的危险因素。本研究旨在探讨窄分叉主动脉对择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)结果的影响。
本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选条目进行系统综述。我们使用受控词汇(词库)和自由文本术语的组合,对电子文献数据库进行了检索,以确定比较 NAB 患者与正常分叉主动脉患者 EVAR 结果的相关研究。使用比值比(OR)计算二分类结局的汇总估计值,使用均数差和 95%置信区间(CI)计算连续结局的汇总估计值。为了考虑预期的异质性,应用随机效应模型进行统计分析。
共纳入 6 项观察性研究,总计 2673 例患者(NAB 组 412 例,友好解剖组 2261 例)。两组围手术期死亡率相似(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.30-4.34,P=0.85,I²=0%)。NAB 组的分支狭窄和扭曲需要额外的术中处理更为常见(OR 3.02,95%CI 2.16-4.22,P<0.00001,I²=0%)。然而,两组的 30 天再干预率相似,随访期间分支闭塞的发生率也相似。
现有证据表明,在分叉装置的 EVAR 中,尽管需要进行更多的术中附加操作,但在 NAB 患者中可以安全进行。