• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响热带玉米对草地贪夜蛾和象鼻虫抗性基因组预测准确性的因素

Factors Influencing Genomic Prediction Accuracies of Tropical Maize Resistance to Fall Armyworm and Weevils.

作者信息

Badji Arfang, Machida Lewis, Kwemoi Daniel Bomet, Kumi Frank, Okii Dennis, Mwila Natasha, Agbahoungba Symphorien, Ibanda Angele, Bararyenya Astere, Nghituwamhata Selma Ndapewa, Odong Thomas, Wasswa Peter, Otim Michael, Ochwo-Ssemakula Mildred, Talwana Herbert, Asea Godfrey, Kyamanywa Samuel, Rubaihayo Patrick

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda.

Alliance Bioversity-CIAT, Africa-Office, Kampala P.O. Box 24384, Uganda.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;10(1):29. doi: 10.3390/plants10010029.

DOI:10.3390/plants10010029
PMID:33374402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7823878/
Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) can accelerate variety improvement when training set (TS) size and its relationship with the breeding set (BS) are optimized for prediction accuracies (PAs) of genomic prediction (GP) models. Sixteen GP algorithms were run on phenotypic best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) and estimators (BLUEs) of resistance to both fall armyworm (FAW) and maize weevil (MW) in a tropical maize panel. For MW resistance, 37% of the panel was the TS, and the BS was the remainder, whilst for FAW, random-based training sets (RBTS) and pedigree-based training sets (PBTSs) were designed. PAs achieved with BLUPs varied from 0.66 to 0.82 for MW-resistance traits, and for FAW resistance, 0.694 to 0.714 for RBTS of 37%, and 0.843 to 0.844 for RBTS of 85%, and these were at least two-fold those from BLUEs. For PBTS, FAW resistance PAs were generally higher than those for RBTS, except for one dataset. GP models generally showed similar PAs across individual traits whilst the TS designation was determinant, since a positive correlation (R = 0.92***) between TS size and PAs was observed for RBTS, and for the PBTS, it was negative (R = 0.44**). This study pioneered the use of GS for maize resistance to insect pests in sub-Saharan Africa.

摘要

当针对基因组预测(GP)模型的预测准确性(PA)优化训练集(TS)大小及其与育种集(BS)的关系时,基因组选择(GS)可以加速品种改良。在一个热带玉米群体中,对十六种GP算法进行了运行,这些算法基于对秋粘虫(FAW)和玉米象(MW)抗性的表型最佳线性无偏预测器(BLUP)和估计器(BLUE)。对于MW抗性,群体的37%为TS,其余为BS,而对于FAW,设计了基于随机的训练集(RBTS)和基于系谱的训练集(PBTS)。对于MW抗性性状,使用BLUP获得的PA在0.66至0.82之间,对于FAW抗性,37%的RBTS的PA为0.694至0.714,85%的RBTS的PA为0.843至0.844,这些至少是BLUE获得的PA的两倍。对于PBTS,除了一个数据集外,FAW抗性PA通常高于RBTS。GP模型在各个性状上通常显示出相似的PA,而TS的指定是决定性的,因为对于RBTS,观察到TS大小与PA之间存在正相关(R = 0.92***),而对于PBTS,是负相关(R = 0.44**)。本研究率先在撒哈拉以南非洲将GS用于玉米抗虫害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/a0fd13e37ca6/plants-10-00029-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/86570648c78a/plants-10-00029-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/7062a09a03c0/plants-10-00029-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/1ac8511848cc/plants-10-00029-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/dd6da9789b63/plants-10-00029-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/374f4e3ebd6f/plants-10-00029-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/a0fd13e37ca6/plants-10-00029-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/86570648c78a/plants-10-00029-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/7062a09a03c0/plants-10-00029-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/1ac8511848cc/plants-10-00029-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/dd6da9789b63/plants-10-00029-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/374f4e3ebd6f/plants-10-00029-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5a/7823878/a0fd13e37ca6/plants-10-00029-g006a.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Genomic Prediction Accuracies of Tropical Maize Resistance to Fall Armyworm and Weevils.影响热带玉米对草地贪夜蛾和象鼻虫抗性基因组预测准确性的因素
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;10(1):29. doi: 10.3390/plants10010029.
2
Genetic analyses of tropical maize lines under artificial infestation of fall armyworm and foliar diseases under optimum conditions.在最佳条件下对遭受草地贪夜蛾人工侵染和叶部病害的热带玉米品系进行遗传分析。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 20;14:1086757. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1086757. eCollection 2023.
3
Fall Armyworm Infestation and Development: Screening Tropical Maize Genotypes for Resistance in Zambia.草地贪夜蛾的侵染与发育:在赞比亚筛选热带玉米基因型的抗性
Insects. 2022 Nov 4;13(11):1020. doi: 10.3390/insects13111020.
4
Genomic Prediction of Resistance to Tar Spot Complex of Maize in Multiple Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing SNPs.利用简化基因组测序单核苷酸多态性对多个玉米群体中玉米焦油斑病复合体抗性进行基因组预测
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 16;12:672525. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.672525. eCollection 2021.
5
Genomic Prediction of Kernel Zinc Concentration in Multiple Maize Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Repeat Amplification Sequencing Markers.利用简化基因组测序和重复扩增测序标记对多个玉米群体籽粒锌浓度进行基因组预测
Front Plant Sci. 2020 May 8;11:534. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00534. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluation of fall armyworm resistance in maize germplasm lines using visual leaf injury rating and predator survey.利用叶片可见损伤评级和捕食者调查评估玉米种质系对草地贪夜蛾的抗性
Insect Sci. 2014 Oct;21(5):541-55. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12093. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ab maize by Spodoptera frugiperda in Brazil.巴西草地贪夜蛾对Cry1Ab玉米的田间进化抗性
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;72(9):1727-36. doi: 10.1002/ps.4201. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Spread and impact of fall armyworm ( J.E. Smith) in maize production areas of Kenya.草地贪夜蛾(J.E. 史密斯)在肯尼亚玉米种植区的传播与影响
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2020 Apr 15;292:106804. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106804.
9
Comparison of Models and Whole-Genome Profiling Approaches for Genomic-Enabled Prediction of Septoria Tritici Blotch, Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch, and Tan Spot Resistance in Wheat.基于基因组的小麦叶锈病、条锈病和叶枯病抗性预测模型和全基因组分析方法的比较。
Plant Genome. 2017 Jul;10(2). doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.08.0082.
10
Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.肉用型鸡饲料效率性状的基因组预测准确性评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173620. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Across-Population Genomic Prediction for Maize Hybrids.增强玉米杂交种的跨群体基因组预测
Plants (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;13(21):3105. doi: 10.3390/plants13213105.
2
Linkage mapping and genomic prediction of grain quality traits in tropical maize ( L.).热带玉米(L.)籽粒品质性状的连锁图谱构建与基因组预测
Front Genet. 2024 Feb 21;15:1353289. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1353289. eCollection 2024.
3
Breeding Cultivars for Resistance to the African Sweetpotato Weevils, and in Uganda: A Review of the Current Progress.乌干达抗非洲甘薯象甲栽培品种的培育:当前进展综述

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic Selection for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in a Wheat Breeding Program.小麦育种计划中用于预测赤霉病抗性的基因组选择
Plant Genome. 2015 Nov;8(3):eplantgenome2015.01.0003. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.01.0003.
2
Genetic Basis of Maize Resistance to Multiple Insect Pests: Integrated Genome-Wide Comparative Mapping and Candidate Gene Prioritization.玉米对多种虫害抗性的遗传基础:全基因组整合比较作图和候选基因优先级划分。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;11(6):689. doi: 10.3390/genes11060689.
3
Genome-Wide Analyses and Prediction of Resistance to MLN in Large Tropical Maize Germplasm.
Insects. 2023 Oct 25;14(11):837. doi: 10.3390/insects14110837.
4
Identification of Drought Tolerant Rice ( L.) Genotypes with Asian and African Backgrounds.鉴定具有亚洲和非洲背景的耐旱水稻(Oryza sativa L.)基因型
Plants (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;12(4):922. doi: 10.3390/plants12040922.
5
Host plant resistance for fall armyworm management in maize: relevance, status and prospects in Africa and Asia.玉米秋黏虫防治的寄主植物抗性:在非洲和亚洲的相关性、现状和前景。
Theor Appl Genet. 2022 Nov;135(11):3897-3916. doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04073-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
6
Advances in Cereal Crops Breeding.谷物作物育种进展
Plants (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;10(8):1705. doi: 10.3390/plants10081705.
全基因组分析和预测大型热带玉米种质对 MLN 的抗性。
Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 23;11(1):16. doi: 10.3390/genes11010016.
4
An Integrated Molecular and Conventional Breeding Scheme for Enhancing Genetic Gain in Maize in Africa.一种用于提高非洲玉米遗传增益的分子与传统育种综合方案。
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 6;10:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01430. eCollection 2019.
5
Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods.基于基因组选择方法预测的木薯产量性状。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0224920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224920. eCollection 2019.
6
Benchmarking Parametric and Machine Learning Models for Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits.基于参数和机器学习模型的复杂性状基因组预测的基准测试。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Nov 5;9(11):3691-3702. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400498.
7
Training set determination for genomic selection.基因组选择的训练集确定。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Oct;132(10):2781-2792. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03387-0. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Genetic architecture of maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis through GWAS, linkage analysis and genomic prediction in tropical maize germplasm.通过全基因组关联分析、连锁分析和基因组预测研究热带玉米种质中玉米褪绿斑驳病毒和玉米致死坏死的遗传结构。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Aug;132(8):2381-2399. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03360-x. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Agricultural Economic Traits in Maize, Cattle, and Pig Populations.影响玉米、牛和猪群体农业经济性状基因组选择准确性的因素
Front Genet. 2019 Mar 14;10:189. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00189. eCollection 2019.
10
The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat.训练群体设计对小麦基因组预测准确性的影响。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jul;132(7):1943-1952. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y. Epub 2019 Mar 19.