Suppr超能文献

患有或不患有视网膜病变的糖尿病患者对风险偏好问卷的非理性反应以及与非糖尿病患者的比较。

Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes.

作者信息

Emoto Naoya, Soga Akimi, Fukuda Izumi, Tanimura-Inagaki Kyoko, Harada Taro, Koyano Hajime M, Goto Rei, Sugihara Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

Diabetes & Thyroid Clinic, Sakura Chuo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Dec 14;13:4961-4971. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S283591. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The risk preferences of patients with diabetes have profound effects on the progression of complications. The present study aimed to clarify whether the preferences of patients with diabetes and retinopathy are deliberately risk-seeking or irrational and whether this propensity is specific to those with retinopathy or is also found in patients without retinopathy compared with those without diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 394 patients with diabetes (264 without retinopathy and 130 with retinopathy) and 198 patients without diabetes agreed to participate in this survey. The questions were modified versions of those from the Japan Household Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction, which sought to determine the participants' personal socioeconomic status and risk preferences. In the questionnaires, responses were analyzed by determining the participants' willingness to pay for a lottery ticket and for an insurance policy. Irrational responses were defined as violations of two axioms of the Expected Utility Theory: completeness and transitivity.

RESULTS

The incidence of irrational responses increased with age and was associated with educational level. The incidence of irrational responses was significantly higher in patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy after adjusting for age and educational level. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irrational responses between patients with diabetes but without retinopathy and those without diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The risk-seeking behavior of patients with diabetes and retinopathy was not deliberate but was irrational under uncertainty. Medical professionals should be aware of their patients' propensity to make irrational decisions, which is an important risk factor for the progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes regardless of age and educational level.

摘要

目的

糖尿病患者的风险偏好对并发症的进展有深远影响。本研究旨在阐明糖尿病视网膜病变患者的偏好是刻意寻求风险还是不理性的,以及这种倾向是视网膜病变患者所特有的,还是与无糖尿病的患者相比,在无视网膜病变的糖尿病患者中也存在。

患者与方法

共有394例糖尿病患者(264例无视网膜病变,130例有视网膜病变)和198例无糖尿病患者同意参与本调查。问题是对日本家庭消费者偏好与满意度调查中的问题进行修改后的版本,旨在确定参与者的个人社会经济状况和风险偏好。在问卷中,通过确定参与者购买彩票和保险单的意愿来分析回答。不理性回答被定义为违反预期效用理论的两个公理:完备性和传递性。

结果

不理性回答的发生率随年龄增加而上升,且与教育水平相关。在调整年龄和教育水平后,视网膜病变患者中不理性回答的发生率显著高于无视网膜病变的患者。无视网膜病变的糖尿病患者和无糖尿病患者之间不理性回答的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

糖尿病视网膜病变患者的风险寻求行为并非刻意为之,而是在不确定性下不理性的。医学专业人员应意识到患者做出不理性决策的倾向,这是糖尿病患者视网膜病变进展的一个重要风险因素,无论年龄和教育水平如何。

相似文献

3
Behavioral economics survey of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 May 11;9:649-58. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S82022. eCollection 2015.
4
Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600101.
9
Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122764.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Preferences, Rationality of Choices, and Willingness to Pay for Preventive Medicine in Patients with Graves' Thyrotoxicosis.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 7;15:1971-1979. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S323472. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial Literacy and Gambling Behavior: Evidence from Japan.
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):445-465. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09936-3.
2
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.
3
5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: .
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S48-S65. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S005.
4
Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 26;12:1937-1945. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.
5
Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes mellitus: mechanisms and clinical implications.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;14(10):591-604. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0048-7.
6
The chicken or the egg? Does glycaemic control predict cognitive function or the other way around?
Diabetologia. 2018 Sep;61(9):1913-1917. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4689-9. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
8
Adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to medications: the role of risk preferences.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Feb;34(2):345-351. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1397506. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Type 2 diabetes.
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2239-2251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验