• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者的时间偏好、结果期望和自我管理
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 26;12:1937-1945. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.
2
Association between unrealistic comparative optimism and self-management in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from a cross-sectional, population-based study.2型糖尿病患者不现实的比较性乐观与自我管理之间的关联:一项基于人群的横断面研究结果
Health Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;3(2):e157. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.157. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study.2 型糖尿病患者报告的自我管理行为、中间临床结局与死亡率之间的关联:来自 KORA-A 研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1604-12. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2533. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
4
The influence of value reference point and risk preference on adherence in hypertensive patients in a low-income area of China.中国低收入地区高血压患者的价值参照点和风险偏好对依从性的影响。
Postgrad Med. 2020 Mar;132(2):132-140. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1702849. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
5
Examining the Relationship Between Delay Discounting, Delay Aversion, Diabetes Self-care Behaviors, and Diabetes Outcomes in U.S. Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.探讨美国 2 型糖尿病成年患者中延迟折扣、延迟厌恶、糖尿病自我护理行为与糖尿病结局之间的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):893-900. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2620. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Adherence to Self-Care Behaviors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes-The Role of Risk Preferences.2型糖尿病患者自我护理行为的依从性——风险偏好的作用。
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):844-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
9
Associations between self-management behavior and sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics in elderly people with type 2 diabetes - New results from the population-based KORA studies in Germany.德国基于人群的KORA研究的新成果——2型糖尿病老年人自我管理行为与社会人口学及疾病相关特征之间的关联
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Oct;14(5):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10

引用本文的文献

1
How time and risk preferences affect glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients.时间和风险偏好如何影响2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16791-y.
2
Exploring the factors influencing the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a qualitative interview study using the COM-B model.探索影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者及时进行玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗的因素:一项使用COM-B模型的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12379-4.
3
Relationship Between Delay Discounting and Clinical Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review.延迟折扣与临床糖尿病结局的关系:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):3052-3063. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08981-7. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Intertemporal decision-making as a mediator between personality traits and self-management in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.2型糖尿病中跨期决策作为人格特质与自我管理之间的中介因素:一项横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1210691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1210691. eCollection 2023.
5
How is Patient Adherence Possible? A Novel Mechanistic Model of Adherence Based on Humanities.患者依从性如何成为可能?一种基于人文学科的新型依从性机制模型。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 18;17:1705-1720. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S419277. eCollection 2023.
6
Time and risk preferences and the perceived effectiveness of incentives to comply with diabetic retinopathy screening among older adults with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病老年患者的时间和风险偏好以及对遵守糖尿病视网膜病变筛查激励措施的感知效果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1101909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101909. eCollection 2023.
7
Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire to assess social cognitive factors of self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes: a psychometric study.一种评估2型糖尿病患者自我管理社会认知因素的新型问卷的开发与评价:一项心理测量学研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2022 Feb 9;21(1):483-492. doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-00999-0. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes.患有或不患有视网膜病变的糖尿病患者对风险偏好问卷的非理性反应以及与非糖尿病患者的比较。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Dec 14;13:4961-4971. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S283591. eCollection 2020.
9
Different information needs in subgroups of people with diabetes mellitus: a latent class analysis.糖尿病亚组人群的不同信息需求:潜类分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):1901. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09968-9.

本文引用的文献

1
An Interactive Simulation to Change Outcome Expectancies and Intentions in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Within-Subjects Experiment.一项用于改变2型糖尿病成人结局期望和意图的交互式模拟:受试者内实验。
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Jan 9;3(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8069.
2
Partners and Alerts in Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.药物依从性的伴侣和提醒:一项随机临床试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1536-1542. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4389-7. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
5. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: .5. 2 型糖尿病的预防或延迟: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S51-S54. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S005.
4
What Explains Differences in Smoking, Drinking, and Other Health-Related Behaviors?如何解释吸烟、饮酒及其他与健康相关行为的差异?
Am Econ Rev. 2005 May;95(2):238-42. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670464.
5
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.2017 年版《糖尿病患者自我管理教育及支持标准》。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Oct;43(5):449-464. doi: 10.1177/0145721717722968. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
6
The effect of interactive reminders on medication adherence: A randomized trial.互动提醒对药物依从性的影响:一项随机试验。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Long-term patterns of adherence to medication therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Denmark: The importance of initiation.丹麦2型糖尿病患者药物治疗的长期依从模式:起始治疗的重要性。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0179546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179546. eCollection 2017.
8
Can present biasedness explain early onset of diabetes and subsequent disease progression? Exploring causal inference by linking survey and register data.当前的偏见能否解释糖尿病的早发和随后的疾病进展?通过链接调查和登记数据探索因果推理。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/0145721716689694.
10
Randomised controlled trial of alternative messages to increase enrolment in a healthy food programme among individuals with diabetes.一项关于采用不同信息以提高糖尿病患者参与健康食品计划比例的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 30;6(11):e012009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012009.

2型糖尿病患者的时间偏好、结果期望和自我管理

Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Karl Florian M, Holle Rolf, Schwettmann Lars, Peters Annette, Laxy Michael

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany,

German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany,

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 26;12:1937-1945. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S175045
PMID:30288034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6163016/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient self-management is crucial to prevent complications and mortality in type 2 diabetes. From an economic perspective, time preference predicts short-sighted decision making and thus might help to explain non-adherence to self-anagement recommendations. However, recent studies on this association have shown mixed results.

PURPOSE

In this study, we tested whether the combination of time preference and outcome expectancy can improve the predictions of self-management behavior.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 665 patients with type 2 diabetes were obtained from the cross-sectional KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) GEFU 4 study. Time preference and outcome expectancy were measured by one question each, which were answered on a 4-point Likert scale. Their association with six self-managing behaviors was tested in logistic and linear regression analyses. Likewise, we examined the association between self-management and the interaction of outcome expectancy and time preference.

RESULTS

A high time preference was associated with a significantly lower sum of self-management behaviors (β=-0.29, 95% CI [-0.54, -0.04]). Higher outcome expectancy was associated with a higher self-management score (β=0.21, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.45]). The interaction model showed that low time preference was only associated with better self-management when combined with a high outcome expectancy (β=0.05, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.39] vs β=0.27, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.63]).

CONCLUSION

Time preference and outcome expectancy are interrelated predictors of patient self-management and could be used to identify and to intervene on patients with a potentially poor self-management.

摘要

背景

患者自我管理对于预防2型糖尿病的并发症和死亡率至关重要。从经济角度来看,时间偏好预示着短视的决策,因此可能有助于解释对自我管理建议的不依从性。然而,近期关于这种关联的研究结果不一。

目的

在本研究中,我们测试了时间偏好和结果期望的组合是否能改善对自我管理行为的预测。

患者与方法

来自665名2型糖尿病患者的数据取自横断面的奥格斯堡地区合作健康研究(KORA)GEFU 4研究。时间偏好和结果期望分别通过一个问题进行测量,答案采用4点李克特量表。在逻辑回归和线性回归分析中测试了它们与六种自我管理行为的关联。同样,我们研究了自我管理与结果期望和时间偏好的相互作用之间的关联。

结果

高时间偏好与自我管理行为总和显著降低相关(β=-0.29,95%可信区间[-0.54,-0.04])。更高的结果期望与更高的自我管理得分相关(β=0.21,95%可信区间[-0.03,0.45])。相互作用模型显示,只有在与高结果期望相结合时,低时间偏好才与更好的自我管理相关(β=0.05,95%可信区间[-0.28,0.39] 对比β=0.27,95%可信区间[-0.09,0.63])。

结论

时间偏好和结果期望是患者自我管理的相互关联的预测因素,可用于识别并干预自我管理可能较差的患者。