Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者的时间偏好、结果期望和自我管理

Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Karl Florian M, Holle Rolf, Schwettmann Lars, Peters Annette, Laxy Michael

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany,

German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany,

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 26;12:1937-1945. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient self-management is crucial to prevent complications and mortality in type 2 diabetes. From an economic perspective, time preference predicts short-sighted decision making and thus might help to explain non-adherence to self-anagement recommendations. However, recent studies on this association have shown mixed results.

PURPOSE

In this study, we tested whether the combination of time preference and outcome expectancy can improve the predictions of self-management behavior.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 665 patients with type 2 diabetes were obtained from the cross-sectional KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) GEFU 4 study. Time preference and outcome expectancy were measured by one question each, which were answered on a 4-point Likert scale. Their association with six self-managing behaviors was tested in logistic and linear regression analyses. Likewise, we examined the association between self-management and the interaction of outcome expectancy and time preference.

RESULTS

A high time preference was associated with a significantly lower sum of self-management behaviors (β=-0.29, 95% CI [-0.54, -0.04]). Higher outcome expectancy was associated with a higher self-management score (β=0.21, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.45]). The interaction model showed that low time preference was only associated with better self-management when combined with a high outcome expectancy (β=0.05, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.39] vs β=0.27, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.63]).

CONCLUSION

Time preference and outcome expectancy are interrelated predictors of patient self-management and could be used to identify and to intervene on patients with a potentially poor self-management.

摘要

背景

患者自我管理对于预防2型糖尿病的并发症和死亡率至关重要。从经济角度来看,时间偏好预示着短视的决策,因此可能有助于解释对自我管理建议的不依从性。然而,近期关于这种关联的研究结果不一。

目的

在本研究中,我们测试了时间偏好和结果期望的组合是否能改善对自我管理行为的预测。

患者与方法

来自665名2型糖尿病患者的数据取自横断面的奥格斯堡地区合作健康研究(KORA)GEFU 4研究。时间偏好和结果期望分别通过一个问题进行测量,答案采用4点李克特量表。在逻辑回归和线性回归分析中测试了它们与六种自我管理行为的关联。同样,我们研究了自我管理与结果期望和时间偏好的相互作用之间的关联。

结果

高时间偏好与自我管理行为总和显著降低相关(β=-0.29,95%可信区间[-0.54,-0.04])。更高的结果期望与更高的自我管理得分相关(β=0.21,95%可信区间[-0.03,0.45])。相互作用模型显示,只有在与高结果期望相结合时,低时间偏好才与更好的自我管理相关(β=0.05,95%可信区间[-0.28,0.39] 对比β=0.27,95%可信区间[-0.09,0.63])。

结论

时间偏好和结果期望是患者自我管理的相互关联的预测因素,可用于识别并干预自我管理可能较差的患者。

相似文献

1
Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 26;12:1937-1945. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.
4
The influence of value reference point and risk preference on adherence in hypertensive patients in a low-income area of China.
Postgrad Med. 2020 Mar;132(2):132-140. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1702849. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Adherence to Self-Care Behaviors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes-The Role of Risk Preferences.
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):844-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
10

引用本文的文献

1
How time and risk preferences affect glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16791-y.
3
Relationship Between Delay Discounting and Clinical Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):3052-3063. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08981-7. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
5
How is Patient Adherence Possible? A Novel Mechanistic Model of Adherence Based on Humanities.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 18;17:1705-1720. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S419277. eCollection 2023.
7
9
Different information needs in subgroups of people with diabetes mellitus: a latent class analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):1901. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09968-9.

本文引用的文献

2
Partners and Alerts in Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1536-1542. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4389-7. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
5. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: .
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S51-S54. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S005.
4
What Explains Differences in Smoking, Drinking, and Other Health-Related Behaviors?
Am Econ Rev. 2005 May;95(2):238-42. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670464.
5
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Oct;43(5):449-464. doi: 10.1177/0145721717722968. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
6
The effect of interactive reminders on medication adherence: A randomized trial.
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
9
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/0145721716689694.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验