• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的疗效和安全性比较:一项多治疗荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

The Key Laboratory of Major Autoimmune Diseases, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14308. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/ddg.14308
PMID:33377312
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of biologics for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed 60 randomized controlled trials (34,020 participants), which compared 14 biological drugs for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The main assessment criteria were ≥ 90 % reductions in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and the number of patients who reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Secondary criteria were ≥ 75 % reductions in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75), Physician's Global Assessment 0/1 (PGA 0/1) and infections.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis showed that biologics were significantly more effective than placebo. Ixekizumab, risankizumab, and bimekizumab were among the most effective treatments, and tildrakizumab, guselkumab and risankizumab were better than the other drugs with respect to safety. Risankizumab and guselkumab performed relatively stable with respect to both efficacy and safety. At the class level, blockers of interleukin (IL)-17A showed favorable efficacy while inhibitors of the p19 subunit of IL-23 were best tolerated of all efficient biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

Ixekizumab was the most effective biologic in PASI 90, while IL-23p19 inhibitors, risankizumab and guselkumab performed relatively stable with respect to efficacy and safety.

摘要

目的

比较生物制剂治疗中重度斑块状银屑病患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们系统地综述了 60 项随机对照试验(34020 名参与者),比较了 14 种生物药物治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的疗效。主要评估标准为银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI90)≥90%的缓解率和报告治疗中出现不良反应(AE)的患者人数。次要评估标准为 PASI75 缓解率≥75%、医生总体评估 0/1(PGA0/1)和感染情况。

结果

本网络荟萃分析显示,生物制剂明显比安慰剂更有效。依奇珠单抗、里司努单抗和比美吉珠单抗是最有效的治疗方法之一,而替西珠单抗、古塞库单抗和里司努单抗在安全性方面优于其他药物。里司努单抗和古塞库单抗在疗效和安全性方面都相对稳定。在药物类别方面,白细胞介素(IL)-17A 阻断剂显示出良好的疗效,而 IL-23p19 抑制剂中,里司努单抗和古塞库单抗的耐受性最好。

结论

依奇珠单抗在 PASI90 方面疗效最佳,而 IL-23p19 抑制剂、里司努单抗和古塞库单抗在疗效和安全性方面相对稳定。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.生物制剂治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的疗效和安全性比较:一项多治疗荟萃分析。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14308. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
2
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 Inhibitors Brodalumab, Secukinumab, Ixekizumab, Ustekinumab, Guselkumab, Tildrakizumab, and Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.短期疗效和安全性的白介素-17、白介素-12/23 和白介素-23 抑制剂布罗达单抗、司库奇尤单抗、依奇珠单抗、乌司奴单抗、古塞库单抗、替西珠单抗和瑞莎珠单抗治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Immunol Res. 2019 Sep 10;2019:2546161. doi: 10.1155/2019/2546161. eCollection 2019.
3
A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 12-week efficacy, safety and speed of response from a randomized, double-blinded trial.中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者中,ixekizumab与guselkumab的头对头比较:一项随机双盲试验的12周疗效、安全性及反应速度
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jun;182(6):1348-1358. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18851. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
4
Assessing the relative efficacy of interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 targeted treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response.评估白细胞介素-17 和白细胞介素-23 靶向治疗药物治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的相对疗效:PASI 反应的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220868. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis.生物制剂与口服药物治疗斑块状银屑病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Mar 1;156(3):258-269. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4029.
6
Short-term effectiveness of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂治疗中重度斑块状银屑病患者的短期疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Dermatol Sci. 2020 Jul;99(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Comparing the efficacy and tolerability of biologic therapies in psoriasis: an updated network meta-analysis.比较生物疗法治疗银屑病的疗效和耐受性:一项更新的网状荟萃分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Oct;183(4):638-649. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19325. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
8
Indirect comparisons of ixekizumab versus three interleukin-23 p19 inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis - efficacy findings up to week 12.比较依奇珠单抗与三种白细胞介素-23 p19 抑制剂治疗中重度斑块型银屑病患者的间接疗效:第 12 周的结果。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Feb;33(1):54-61. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1747592. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
Number Needed to Treat Network Meta-Analysis to Compare Biologic Drugs for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.比较中重度银屑病生物制剂的网络荟萃分析所需治疗人数
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2256-2269. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02065-w. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
10
A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week efficacy and safety results from a randomized, double-blinded trial.中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者中,依奇珠单抗与古塞库单抗的头对头比较:一项随机双盲试验的24周疗效和安全性结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jun;184(6):1047-1058. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19509. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub7.
2
Secukinumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Narrative Review on Early Treatment and Real-World Evidence.司库奇尤单抗治疗银屑病:关于早期治疗及真实世界证据的叙述性综述
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;14(10):2739-2757. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01255-4. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Coverage of Specialty Drugs for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis by Commercial Insurance Companies.
商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖情况。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2022 Oct;7(4):160-163. doi: 10.1177/24755303221101843. Epub 2022 May 15.
4
Comparative short-term risks of infection and serious infection in patients receiving biologic and small-molecule therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.接受生物制剂和小分子疗法治疗银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者的感染及严重感染的短期比较风险:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Oct 27;14:20406223231206225. doi: 10.1177/20406223231206225. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing Meta-Analyses with ChatGPT in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Tolerance of Systemic Therapies in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis.在中度至重度斑块状银屑病系统治疗的有效性和耐受性评估中,将Meta分析与ChatGPT进行比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 20;12(16):5410. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165410.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药物治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 12;7(7):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub6.
7
Comparation of time-course, dose-effect, influencing factors and adverse events of biologics in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.比较生物制剂治疗成人中重度斑块型银屑病的时间进程、剂量效应、影响因素和不良反应。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 25;14:1151977. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151977. eCollection 2023.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
9
Direct Comparison of Real-world Effectiveness of Biologics for Psoriasis using Absolute and Relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Scores in a Prospective Multicentre Cohort.基于绝对和相对银屑病面积和严重程度指数评分的前瞻性多中心队列研究比较银屑病生物制剂的真实世界疗效。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 May 16;102:adv00712. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.206.