• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖情况。

Coverage of Specialty Drugs for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis by Commercial Insurance Companies.

作者信息

Learned Christine, Alsukait Sara, Fiumara Kristin R, Ortega Melissa, Chambers James D, Rosmarin David

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2022 Oct;7(4):160-163. doi: 10.1177/24755303221101843. Epub 2022 May 15.

DOI:10.1177/24755303221101843
PMID:39296962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11361503/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialty medications provide effective treatment with limited adverse effects to patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; however, variable coverage and high costs often create a barrier to treatment for patients with commercial health insurance.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate coverage of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis specialty medications by commercial insurance companies.

METHODS

We compiled data regarding specialty drug coverage for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database and analyzed the data for any notable trends. The SPEC database lists coverage decisions for 158 specialty drugs by 17 of the largest US commercial health plans, as well as data regarding the types of evidence cited by these insurance plans when making coverage decisions.

RESULTS

Our results showed that insurance plans tend to be more restrictive than the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) label when covering medications for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, medications for psoriatic arthritis tended to be less restricted than for psoriasis, and medications were most commonly approved as second line agents for both indications.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirms that variability in insurance coverage exists for the indications of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

摘要

背景

专科药物为银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者提供了有效的治疗,且副作用有限;然而,保险覆盖范围的差异和高昂的费用常常给商业医疗保险患者的治疗造成障碍。

目的

我们旨在评估商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖情况。

方法

我们使用塔夫茨医学中心专科药物证据与覆盖(SPEC)数据库汇编了有关银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物覆盖的数据,并分析了数据中任何显著趋势。SPEC数据库列出了美国17家最大的商业健康保险计划对158种专科药物的覆盖决定,以及这些保险计划在做出覆盖决定时所引用的证据类型的数据。

结果

我们的结果表明,在覆盖银屑病和银屑病关节炎药物方面,保险计划往往比美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标签限制更严格。此外,银屑病关节炎药物的限制往往比银屑病药物少,两种适应症的药物最常被批准作为二线药物。

结论

我们的分析证实,银屑病和银屑病关节炎适应症的保险覆盖存在差异。

相似文献

1
Coverage of Specialty Drugs for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis by Commercial Insurance Companies.商业保险公司对银屑病和银屑病关节炎专科药物的覆盖情况。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2022 Oct;7(4):160-163. doi: 10.1177/24755303221101843. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
Discrepancies Between FDA-Required Labeling and Evidence that Payers Cite in Drug Coverage Policies.FDA 要求的标签与支付方在药物覆盖政策中引用的证据之间的差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1240-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1240.
3
Clinical monograph for drug formulary review: systemic agents for psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis.药物处方集评审临床专论:银屑病/银屑病关节炎的全身用药
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.1.33.
4
Undertreatment, treatment trends, and treatment dissatisfaction among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the United States: findings from the National Psoriasis Foundation surveys, 2003-2011.美国银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者的治疗不足、治疗趋势和治疗不满:2003-2011 年全国银屑病基金会调查结果。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Oct;149(10):1180-5. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5264.
5
Impact of a Patient Support Program on Patient Adherence to Adalimumab and Direct Medical Costs in Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis.患者支持计划对克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎、类风湿性关节炎、银屑病、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者阿达木单抗依从性和直接医疗费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):859-867. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16272. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
Use of prescriber requirements among US commercial health plans.美国商业健康计划中的处方要求使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Dec;27(12):1757-1762. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1757.
7
Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.考察美国商业健康计划在专科药物覆盖决策中使用临床与经济评论学会报告的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):257-264. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.257.
8
What types of real-world evidence studies do U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions?美国商业健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用了哪些类型的真实世界证据研究?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-1311. doi: 10.1002/pds.4992. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
Specialty Drug Coverage Varies Across Commercial Health Plans In The US.美国商业健康计划中的特药覆盖范围各不相同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1041-1047. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1553.
10
Commercial health plans use of patient subgroup restrictions: An analysis of orphan and US Food and Drug Administration-expedited programs.商业健康计划对患者亚组的限制使用:对孤儿药和美国食品和药物管理局加速审批项目的分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 May;29(5):472-479. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22363. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
AMCP Market Insights: Payer best practices in food allergy management.AMCP市场洞察:食物过敏管理中的支付方最佳实践
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Aug;31(8-b Suppl):S1-S12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8-b.s1.
2
Use and Cost of First-Line Biologic Medications to Treat Plaque Psoriasis in the US.美国一线生物药物治疗斑块状银屑病的使用情况及成本
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0669.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.生物制剂治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的疗效和安全性比较:一项多治疗荟萃分析。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14308. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
2
Variation in US private health plans' coverage of orphan drugs.美国私人健康保险计划对罕见病药物覆盖范围的差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Oct;25(10):508-512.
3
Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Focus on special populations and chronic infections.银屑病:哪种疗法适合哪种患者:关注特殊人群和慢性感染。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.056. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents.银屑病:哪种疗法适合哪种患者:银屑病合并症和首选的系统药物。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.057. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Specialty Drug Coverage Varies Across Commercial Health Plans In The US.美国商业健康计划中的特药覆盖范围各不相同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1041-1047. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1553.
6
Estimated cost efficacy of systemic treatments that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.美国食品和药物管理局批准的用于治疗中重度银屑病的系统治疗的成本效益估计。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.028. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
7
Economic Burden of Psoriasis in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国银屑病的经济负担:系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Jun;151(6):651-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3593.