Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):16-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.016.
Among the different drugs involved in pediatric exposures and poisonings, opioids are the most important, given their rise in nonmedical use. Opioid poisonings in children can result in serious symptoms or complications, including respiratory disorders such as apnea, respiratory failure, and respiratory depression; psychiatric or nervous system disorders such as agitation, seizures, and coma; and cardiac disorders such as tachycardia, bradycardia, and cardiac arrest. Opioid poisonings in children can have delayed onset of symptoms as well as severe and prolonged toxic effects. Many studies have examined the economic burden of opioid poisoning in the general population, but very little is known about the pediatric population. To estimate the economic burden associated with pediatric prescription opioid poisonings. This study examined opioid poisonings in pediatric patients, defined as patients aged less than 18 years, for the 2012 base year. Costs were estimated using the 2012 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), Multiple Cause-of-Death (MCOD) file, and other published sources, while applying a societal perspective. The Bottom Up approach was used to estimate the total cost of pediatric prescription opioid poisonings. Direct costs included costs associated with emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and ambulance transports. Indirect costs were estimated using the human capital method and included productivity costs due to caregivers' absenteeism and premature mortality among children. Descriptive statistics were employed in calculating costs. The total costs of pediatric prescription opioid poisonings and exposure in the United States were $230.8 million in 2012. Total direct costs were estimated to be over $21.1 million, the majority resulting from prescription opioid poisoning-related inpatient stays. Total indirect (productivity) costs were calculated at $209.7 million, and 98.6% of these costs were attributed to opioid poisoning-related mortality. Pediatric prescription opioid poisoning-related ED visits, inpatient stays, and deaths were most common in patients aged 13-17 years and those in mid to large urban areas. Most were unintentional. Pediatric prescription opioid poisonings resulted in direct and indirect costs of $230.8 million in 2012. While these costs are low in comparison with the costs of prescription opioid poisoning in the general population, the number of pediatric poisonings represents only a small fraction of total poisonings. Quantified costs associated with pediatric prescription opioid poisonings can help decision makers to understand the economic trade-offs in planning interventions. This research had no external funding but was funded by an unrestricted research grant made to the Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science by kaléo Pharma, maker of a naloxone product. The authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests. Portions of this study were presented as an abstract at the 22nd Annual ISPOR Meeting; May 22, 2017; Boston, MA.
在涉及儿科暴露和中毒的各种药物中,阿片类药物最为重要,因为它们的非医疗用途有所增加。儿童阿片类药物中毒可导致严重的症状或并发症,包括呼吸障碍,如呼吸暂停、呼吸衰竭和呼吸抑制;精神或神经系统障碍,如激动、癫痫发作和昏迷;以及心脏障碍,如心动过速、心动过缓和心搏停止。儿童阿片类药物中毒的症状可能会延迟出现,并且具有严重和持久的毒性作用。许多研究都考察了普通人群中阿片类药物中毒的经济负担,但对儿科人群知之甚少。本研究旨在评估与儿科处方阿片类药物中毒相关的经济负担。该研究以年龄小于 18 岁的患者为研究对象,考察了 2012 年的儿科阿片类药物中毒病例。利用 2012 年全国急诊部样本(NEDS)、儿童住院数据库(KID)、多死因(MCOD)档案和其他已发表资料,采用社会视角估计成本。利用自下而上的方法估算儿科处方阿片类药物中毒的总费用。直接成本包括与急诊部(ED)就诊、住院和救护车转运相关的费用。间接成本利用人力资本法估算,包括因儿童看护者旷工和过早死亡而产生的生产力成本。采用描述性统计方法计算成本。2012 年,美国儿童处方阿片类药物中毒和暴露的总费用为 2.308 亿美元。总直接成本估计超过 2110 万美元,主要来自与处方阿片类药物中毒相关的住院治疗。总间接(生产力)成本为 2.097 亿美元,其中 98.6%归因于与阿片类药物中毒相关的死亡率。儿科处方阿片类药物中毒相关的 ED 就诊、住院和死亡在 13-17 岁的患者和位于中等或大城市地区的患者中最为常见。大多数为非故意中毒。2012 年,儿科处方阿片类药物中毒导致直接和间接成本为 2.308 亿美元。尽管这些成本与普通人群中阿片类药物中毒的成本相比较低,但儿童中毒人数仅占总中毒人数的一小部分。量化的儿科处方阿片类药物中毒相关成本有助于决策者了解规划干预措施的经济权衡。本研究无外部资金,但得到了 kaléo Pharma(一种纳洛酮产品的制造商)向药学院药代动力学与药物结果科学系提供的一项无限制研究赠款的资助。作者声明没有利益冲突或财务利益。本研究的部分内容曾作为摘要在第 22 届 ISPOR 年度会议上展示;2017 年 5 月 22 日;波士顿,马萨诸塞州。