• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion.比较使用和不使用临时锚固装置的 Forsus 矫治器对骨性安氏 II 类错牙合的疗效。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):255-266. doi: 10.2319/051120-421.1.
2
One phase or two phase orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion ?安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形采用一期还是二期正畸治疗?
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Sep;20(3):72-73. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0049-y.
3
The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.Herbst矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合患者的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Jun;38(3):324-33. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv057. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.带临时锚固装置的固定功能矫治器对安氏II类错牙合畸形的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J World Fed Orthod. 2021 Jun;10(2):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion?安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形采用一阶段还是两阶段正畸治疗?
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Jun;20(2):56-57. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0035-4.
6
Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人安氏Ⅱ类错牙合下颌前导装置的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):163-173. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz089.
7
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.儿童上前牙前突(安氏II类错颌)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 13(11):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3.
8
Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.使用插入下颌骨联合处的微型钢板评估骨骼锚固式Forsus FRD的效果:治疗安氏II类错牙合的一种新方法。
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):413-9. doi: 10.2319/051314-345.1. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
9
Is there any enhanced treatment effect on class II growing patients when Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device is reinforced by either miniplates or miniscrews? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在使用微型钢板或微螺钉增强 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置时,是否会对生长 II 类患者有增强的治疗效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthod. 2021 Mar;19(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Angle class II correction: stepwise mandibular advancement or bite jumping? : A systematic review and meta-analysis of skeletal, dental and condylar effects.安氏II类错颌矫治:逐步下颌前伸还是咬合跳跃?:关于骨骼、牙齿和髁突影响的系统评价与Meta分析
J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Jul;81(4):286-300. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00226-6. Epub 2020 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Skeletal versus conventional anchorage in dentofacial orthopedics: an international modified Delphi consensus study.牙颌面正畸中骨支抗与传统支抗:一项国际改良德尔菲共识研究
Prog Orthod. 2025 Mar 3;26(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-025-00556-4.
2
Optimal sites and angles for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants at infrazygomatic crest: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based study.颧下嵴处正畸微型种植体植入的最佳部位和角度:一项基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的研究
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Dec 15;14(12):8893-8902. eCollection 2022.
3
Development of an Artificial Intelligence System for the Automatic Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Maturation Status.用于自动评估颈椎成熟状态的人工智能系统的开发。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;11(12):2200. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122200.

本文引用的文献

1
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
2
Influence of conventional and skeletal anchorage system supported fixed functional appliance on maxillo-mandibular complex and temporomandibular joint: A preliminary comparative cone beam computed tomography study.传统及骨支抗系统支持的固定功能矫治器对颌骨复合体及颞下颌关节的影响:一项初步的锥形束计算机断层扫描对比研究
Int Orthod. 2019 Jun;17(2):256-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: .评价微型板锚定 Forsus 耐疲劳矫治器在骨骼 II 类生长患者中的应用:
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):391-403. doi: 10.2319/062018-468.1. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus™ fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Forsus™抗疲劳矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合畸形的牙颌面效应:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Feb 15;7:5. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_80_17. eCollection 2018.
5
Treatment outcomes of Class II malocclusion cases treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.微螺钉支抗 Forsus 疲劳阻力矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]畸形的疗效评价:一项随机对照研究。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):824-833. doi: 10.2319/032717-214.1. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
6
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
7
Effects of miniplate anchored and conventional Forsus Fatigue Resistant Devices in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.微型钛板固定矫治器与传统Forsus抗疲劳矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合的疗效比较
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):1026-1032. doi: 10.2319/122515-887.1. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.微型种植体支抗Forsus抗疲劳装置的三维效应:一项随机对照试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):292-305. doi: 10.2319/012515-55.1. Epub 2015 May 19.
9
Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.使用微螺钉支抗的 Forsus 疲劳阻生器的治疗效果。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):76-87. doi: 10.2319/032613-240.1. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
10
Class II malocclusion division 1: a new classification method by cephalometric analysis.安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类:一种基于头影测量分析的新分类方法。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;13(3):192-6.

比较使用和不使用临时锚固装置的 Forsus 矫治器对骨性安氏 II 类错牙合的疗效。

A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion.

作者信息

Liu Lu, Zhan Qi, Zhou Jing, Kuang Qianyun, Yan Xinyu, Zhang Xiaoqi, Shan Yue, Lai Wenli, Long Hu

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):255-266. doi: 10.2319/051120-421.1.

DOI:10.2319/051120-421.1
PMID:33378419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8028478/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices (TADs) for patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Through a predefined search strategy, electronic searching was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and SIGLE with no language restrictions. Eligible study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration tool) were conducted by two authors independently and in duplicate. Any disagreement was solved by discussion or judged by a third reviewer. Statistical pooling, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessment of small-study effects were conducted by using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Stata 12.0. Heterogeneity was analyzed for different types of study designs, TADs, and radiographic examinations.

RESULTS

Electronic search yielded a total of 256 studies after removing duplicates. Among them, six studies were finally included. All articles were of high quality. The pooled mean differences were -0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.59, 0.05) for SNA, 0.58 (95% CI: -0.07, 1.23) for SNB, -0.86 (95% CI: -1.74, -0.03) for ANB, 1.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 2.80) for Co-Po, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.28, 1.23) for SN-MP, -7.56 (95% CI: -11.37, -3.76) for L1-MP, 0.47 (95% CI: -0.98, 1.91) for overjet, 0.39 (95% CI: -0.57, 1.35) for overbite, -1.84 (95% CI: -5.15, 1.47) for SN-OP, and 4.97 (95% CI: -1.22, 11.17) for nasolabial angle.

CONCLUSIONS

TADs (especially miniplates) were able to eliminate dental adverse effects of Forsus appliances for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

摘要

目的

比较使用和不使用临时支抗装置(TADs)的Forsus矫治器对骨性安氏II类错牙合患者的疗效。

材料与方法

通过预定义的检索策略,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CENTRAL、ProQuest学位论文数据库和SIGLE中进行电子检索,无语言限制。由两位作者独立且重复地进行合格研究的筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估(Cochrane协作工具)。任何分歧通过讨论解决或由第三位审阅者裁决。使用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis和Stata 12.0进行统计合并、敏感性分析、亚组分析和小研究效应评估。对不同类型的研究设计、TADs和影像学检查进行异质性分析。

结果

去除重复项后,电子检索共获得256项研究。其中,最终纳入6项研究。所有文章质量均较高。SNA的合并平均差为-0.27(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.59,0.05),SNB为0.58(95%CI:-0.07,1.23),ANB为-0.86(95%CI:-1.74,-0,03),Co-Po为1.63(95%CI:0,46,2.80),SN-MP为0.75(95%CI:0.28,1,23),L1-MP为-7.56(95%CI:-11.37,-3.76),覆盖为0.47(95%CI:-0.98,1.91),覆牙合为0.39(95%CI:-0.57,1.35),SN-OP为-1.84(95%CI:-5.15,1.47),鼻唇角为4.97(95%CI:-1.22,11.17)。

结论

TADs(尤其是微型钛板)能够消除Forsus矫治器在矫治骨性安氏II类错牙合时的牙齿不良反应。