Suppr超能文献

黏结无托槽矫治器对釉质脱矿和牙周状况的影响。

Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):339-346. doi: 10.2319/80819-518.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status in patients during fixed orthodontic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients, age 12 to 18 years, who had Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding in the permanent dentition were selected for this study. APC flash-free and conventional ceramic brackets were bonded for a split-mouth study design. The quadrant allocation was randomized. Demineralization records were obtained immediately after bonding (T0), 1 month after bonding (T1), and 6 months after bonding (T2). Clinical periodontal measurements, including gingival index, plaque index, and bleeding upon probing, were obtained before bonding (T0) and at the same time points (T1 and T2). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests to compare parameters between groups and times.

RESULTS

Demineralization values decreased on most sides of the brackets for both groups between T0 and T1. In the conventional group, there was significantly higher demineralization on more sides compared with flash-free brackets between T1 and T2. With one exception, the decreased values were found in the incisal/occlusal sides of all brackets at T2. All periodontal parameters showed significant increases after 6 months of treatment in both groups. Intergroup comparison showed no significant differences in demineralization or periodontal measurements at any of the time points.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of APC flash-free and conventional brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal health did not differ from each other.

摘要

目的

评估在固定正畸治疗中使用黏合剂预涂(APC)无闪光托槽对釉质脱矿和牙周状况的影响。

材料和方法

选择 30 名年龄在 12 至 18 岁之间、恒牙有轻度至中度拥挤的 Angle Ⅰ类或Ⅱ类错牙合的患者进行这项研究。采用分口设计,将 APC 无闪光托槽和传统陶瓷托槽分别黏结于上下颌。象限分配随机化。在黏结后即刻(T0)、黏结后 1 个月(T1)和黏结后 6 个月(T2)记录脱矿情况。在黏结前(T0)和同一时间点(T1 和 T2)测量临床牙周参数,包括牙龈指数、菌斑指数和探诊出血。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Friedman 检验对组间和时间点的参数进行比较。

结果

两组在 T0 至 T1 之间,大多数托槽的侧方釉质脱矿值都有所降低。在传统组中,与无闪光托槽相比,T1 至 T2 之间有更多侧方的脱矿值显著更高。除了一个例外,所有托槽的切缘/咬合侧在 T2 时都发现了降低值。在两组中,经过 6 个月的治疗后,所有牙周参数都有显著增加。组间比较显示,在任何时间点,脱矿或牙周测量均无显著差异。

结论

APC 无闪光托槽和传统托槽对釉质脱矿和牙周健康的影响无明显差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验