Suppr超能文献

预防性局部治疗表皮生长因子受体抑制剂诱导的发疹性脓疱病:一项随机临床试验。

Prophylactic Topical Treatment for EGFR Inhibitor-Induced Papulopustular Rash: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel,

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel,

出版信息

Dermatology. 2021;237(6):988-994. doi: 10.1159/000511869. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced papulopustular rash is 60-85%.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate prophylactic topical treatment for EGFRI-induced rash.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult cancer patients initiating treatment with EGFRIs were randomized to receive facial topical treatment with chloramphenicol 3% + prednisolone 0.5% (CHL-PRED) ointment, chloramphenicol 3% (CHL) ointment, or aqua cream (AQUA). The primary end points were the incidence of ≥grade 3 rash using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), on days 14 and 30. A subanalysis was conducted for incidence of a protocol-specified significant rash, defined as ≥10 facial papulopustular lesions.

RESULTS

The per-protocol analysis on day 14 included 69 patients, who received CHL-PRED (21), CHL (23), or AQUA (25). The incidence of CTCAE ≥grade 3 rash was not statistically significant between arms; however, the incidence of the protocol-specified significant rash was: CHL-PRED 14%, CHL 39%, and AQUA 48% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). At 30 days, the CTCAE ≥grade 3 incidence was similar, but the incidences of protocol-specified significant rash were 6%, 16%, and 43% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). No significant differences were found between CHL and CHL-PRED and between CHL and AQUA.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic topical CHL-PRED was efficacious when compared to AQUA, in the treatment of EGFRI-induced facial papulopustular rash.

摘要

背景

表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFRi)诱导的发疹性脓疱病的发病率为 60-85%。

目的

研究 EGFRi 诱导性皮疹的预防性局部治疗。

方法

一项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。开始接受 EGFRi 治疗的成年癌症患者被随机分配接受面部局部用氯霉素 3%+泼尼松龙 0.5%(CHL-PRED)软膏、氯霉素 3%(CHL)软膏或 Aqua 霜(AQUA)治疗。主要终点是使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)评估的第 14 天和第 30 天≥3 级皮疹的发生率。进行了一项亚分析,以评估方案规定的显著皮疹的发生率,定义为≥10 个面部丘疹脓疱性病变。

结果

第 14 天的意向治疗分析纳入了 69 例患者,他们分别接受了 CHL-PRED(21 例)、CHL(23 例)或 AQUA(25 例)治疗。各组间 CTCAE ≥3 级皮疹的发生率无统计学意义;然而,方案规定的显著皮疹的发生率为:CHL-PRED 14%、CHL 39%和 AQUA 48%(p=0.03,CHL-PRED 与 AQUA)。30 天时,CTCAE ≥3 级皮疹的发生率相似,但方案规定的显著皮疹的发生率分别为 6%、16%和 43%(p=0.03,CHL-PRED 与 AQUA)。CHL 与 CHL-PRED 之间以及 CHL 与 AQUA 之间无显著差异。

结论

与 AQUA 相比,预防性局部用 CHL-PRED 治疗 EGFRi 诱导的面部丘疹脓疱性皮疹更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验