Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jan;22(1):218-225. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13137. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment.
Twenty consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with DIBH (eight) or RG (twelve) volumetric modulated arc therapy during 2017-2019 were included in this study, with radiopaque markers implanted near or in the targets. Seventeen patients received 25 fractions, while the other three received 15 fractions. Only patients who could not tolerate DIBH received RG treatment. While both techniques relied on respiratory signals from external markers, internal target motions were monitored with kV X-ray imaging during treatment. A 3-mm external gating window was used for DIBH treatment; RG treatment was centered on end-expiration with a duty cycle of 40%, corresponding to an external gating window of 2-3 mm. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20 or 40 gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was calculated from the motion management waveform files recorded at the treatment console.
Within one fraction, the displacement was 0-5 mm for DIBH and 0-6 mm for RG. The average magnitude of displacement for each patient during the entire course of treatment ranged 0-3 mm for both techniques. No statistically significant difference in displacement or residual motion was observed between the two techniques. The average treatment time was 15 min for DIBH and 17 min for RG, with no statistical significance.
The accuracy and efficiency were comparable between RG and DIBH treatment for pancreas irradiation. RG is a feasible alternative strategy to DIBH.
深吸气屏气(DIBH)和呼吸门控(RG)广泛用于减少照射期间呼吸引起的靶区和健康器官的运动。我们假设 RG 对于胰腺治疗可以达到与 DIBH 相当的准确性和效率。
本研究纳入了 2017 年至 2019 年间接受 DIBH(8 例)或 RG(12 例)容积调制弧形治疗的 20 例连续胰腺癌患者,在靶区附近或内部植入不透射线标记物。17 例患者接受 25 个分次,其余 3 例接受 15 个分次。只有不能耐受 DIBH 的患者接受 RG 治疗。两种技术均依赖于外部标记的呼吸信号,但在治疗过程中使用 kV X 射线成像监测内部目标运动。DIBH 治疗采用 3mm 外部门控窗;RG 治疗以呼气末为中心,占空比为 40%,相当于 2-3mm 的外部门控窗。在剂量输送过程中,kV 图像每隔 20 或 40 个机架旋转自动拍摄,从中识别内部标记物。从初始位置计算标记物的位移和残留运动幅度。为了分析治疗效率,从治疗控制台记录的运动管理波形文件中计算每个疗程的治疗时间。
在一个分次内,DIBH 的位移为 0-5mm,RG 的位移为 0-6mm。两种技术在整个治疗过程中每位患者的平均位移幅度为 0-3mm。两种技术的位移或残留运动无统计学差异。DIBH 的平均治疗时间为 15 分钟,RG 为 17 分钟,无统计学差异。
RG 与 DIBH 治疗胰腺照射的准确性和效率相当。RG 是 DIBH 的一种可行替代策略。