Servitje Lorenzo
Department of English, Health, Medicine, and Society Program, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 28;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010019.
Literary-rhetorical devices like figurative language and analogy can help explain concepts that exceed our capacity to grasp intuitively. It is not surprising these devices are used to discuss virulence, pathogenesis, and antibiotics. Allusions to Robert Louis Stevenson's seem to be used with particular frequency in research pertaining to pathogens, especially in studies contemporary with our evolving understanding of antibiotic resistance. More recent references to the text have appeared in research parsing definitions of virulence and acknowledging the role of anti-virulence in future therapeutics. While it is obvious that scientists invoke Stevenson's story for stylistic purposes, its use could go beyond the stylistic-and might even generate rhetorical and imaginative possibilities for framing research. This perspective discusses the first published allusion to in reference to virulence and pathogenesis; comments on a select number of specific instances of in contemporary scientific literature; briefly contextualizes the novel; and concludes with the implications of a more productive engagement with humanistic disciplines in the face of antibiotic resistance.
像比喻性语言和类比这样的文学修辞手段有助于解释那些超出我们直观理解能力的概念。这些手段被用于讨论毒力、发病机制和抗生素也就不足为奇了。在与病原体相关的研究中,对罗伯特·路易斯·斯蒂文森作品的典故引用似乎特别频繁,尤其是在与我们对抗生素耐药性不断演变的理解同步的研究中。在解析毒力定义并承认抗毒力在未来治疗中的作用的研究中,最近出现了对该文本的更多引用。虽然很明显科学家们援引斯蒂文森的故事是出于文体目的,但其用途可能不止于文体——甚至可能为构建研究产生修辞和想象的可能性。这篇文章讨论了首次发表的关于毒力和发病机制的对该作品的典故引用;评论了当代科学文献中一些对该作品的特定引用实例;简要介绍了这部小说的背景;并以面对抗生素耐药性时与人文学科进行更有效互动的意义作为结论。