Nagy Peter, Wylie Ruth, Eschrich Joey, Finn Ed
Center for Science and the Imagination, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Center for Science and the Imagination, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):737-759. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00121-3. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Since its first publication in 1818, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus has transcended genres and cultures to become a foundational myth about science and technology across a multitude of media forms and adaptations. Following in the footsteps of the brilliant yet troubled Victor Frankenstein, professionals and practitioners have been debating the scientific ethics of creating life for decades, never before have powerful tools for doing so been so widely available. This paper investigates how engaging with the Frankenstein myth may help scientists gain a more accurate understanding of their own beliefs and opinions about the social and ethical aspects of their profession and their work. The paper presents findings from phenomenological interviews with twelve scientists working on biotechnology, robotics, or artificial intelligence projects. The results suggest that the Frankenstein myth, and the figure of Victor Frankenstein in particular, establishes norms for scientists about what is considered unethical and dangerous in scientific work. The Frankenstein myth both serves as a social and ethical reference for scientists and a mediator between scientists and the society. Grappling with the cultural ubiquity of the Frankenstein myth prepares scientists to face their ethical dilemmas and create a more transparent research agenda. Meanwhile, by focusing on the differences between real scientists and the imaginary figure of Victor Frankenstein, scientists may avoid being labeled as dangerous individuals, and could better conceptualize the potential societal and ethical perceptions and implications of their research.
自1818年首次出版以来,玛丽·雪莱的《弗兰肯斯坦;或现代普罗米修斯》跨越了体裁和文化,成为众多媒体形式和改编作品中关于科学技术的一个基础神话。在才华横溢却陷入困境的维克多·弗兰肯斯坦的脚步之后,专业人士和从业者几十年来一直在争论创造生命的科学伦理,而此前从未有过如此广泛可用的强大工具来实现这一点。本文探讨了接触弗兰肯斯坦神话如何可能帮助科学家更准确地理解他们自己对其职业和工作的社会及伦理方面的信念和观点。本文展示了对从事生物技术、机器人技术或人工智能项目的十二位科学家进行现象学访谈的结果。结果表明,弗兰肯斯坦神话,尤其是维克多·弗兰肯斯坦这个人物,为科学家确立了关于科学工作中被视为不道德和危险的规范。弗兰肯斯坦神话既是科学家的社会和伦理参考,也是科学家与社会之间的调解者。应对弗兰肯斯坦神话在文化上的普遍存在,能让科学家做好面对伦理困境的准备,并制定更透明的研究议程。与此同时,通过关注真实科学家与虚构人物维克多·弗兰肯斯坦之间的差异,科学家可以避免被贴上危险人物的标签,并能更好地构思其研究可能产生的社会和伦理观念及影响。