Suppr超能文献

心房颤动的卒中与出血风险分层:一项批判性评估。

Stroke and bleeding risk stratification in atrial fibrillation: a critical appraisal.

作者信息

Lane Deirdre A, Lip Gregory Y H

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.

Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Dec 22;22(Suppl O):O14-O27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa178. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly increases the risk of stroke and, therefore, stroke prevention is an essential component of the management for patients with AF. This requires formal assessment of the individual risk of stroke to determine if the patient is eligible for oral anticoagulation (OAC), and if so, their risk of bleeding on OAC, before a treatment decision regarding stroke prevention is made. Risk of stroke is not homogenous; it depends on the presence or absence of risk factors. A plethora of stroke and bleeding risk factors has been identified, including common and less-well established clinical risk factors, plus imaging, urine, and blood biomarkers. Consequently, there are several stroke and bleeding risk stratification scores available and this article provides an overview of them, the risk factors included and how they are scored, and provides a critical appraisal of them. The review also discusses the debate regarding whether female sex is a risk factor or a risk modifier, and highlights the dynamic nature of both stroke and bleeding risk and the need to re-assess these risks periodically to ensure treatment is optimal to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. This review also summarizes the recommended stroke and bleeding risk stratification scores from all current major international guidelines.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)显著增加了中风风险,因此,预防中风是房颤患者管理的重要组成部分。这需要对个体中风风险进行正式评估,以确定患者是否适合口服抗凝药(OAC),如果适合,在做出关于预防中风的治疗决定之前,还要评估其使用OAC时的出血风险。中风风险并非均匀一致;它取决于风险因素的存在与否。已经确定了大量中风和出血风险因素,包括常见的和不太明确的临床风险因素,以及影像学、尿液和血液生物标志物。因此,有几种中风和出血风险分层评分方法,本文对它们、所包含的风险因素及其评分方式进行了概述,并对它们进行了批判性评价。该综述还讨论了关于女性性别是风险因素还是风险修正因素的争论,并强调了中风和出血风险的动态性质,以及需要定期重新评估这些风险,以确保治疗是最佳的,从而降低不良后果的风险。本综述还总结了所有当前主要国际指南推荐的中风和出血风险分层评分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验