Olin Jenifer, Sonsky Alyse, Howard Monica
LIU Post University, Brookville, NY USA.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2020 Aug 21;36(2):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s40616-020-00129-y. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Lag reinforcement schedules have been shown in previous research to be an effective intervention for teaching verbal and nonverbal response variability to individuals with developmental disabilities. In more recent research, variability itself has been considered a reinforceable behavior in its own right (Susa & Schlinger, The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 125-130, 2012). Lag schedules of reinforcement can be used to teach variability by using contingencies that require responses to differ from previous responses. The present study extended Susa and Schlinger's, The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 125-130, (2012) research by using 3 social questions instead of 1 in a random rotation and included probes to test for generality. A changing-criterion design was used to evaluate the results with one 11-year-old female participant diagnosed with autism. During baseline, the participant provided little variability, with rote responses. During the Lag 1 and Lag 2 phases, appropriate variable verbal responding increased with the use of echoic prompts, visual aids, and an error correction procedure. Further, the results also showed that the participant learned to vary her responses by demonstrating the ability to emit 11 novel prompted responses and 13 spontaneous responses. In addition, the participant was able to retain the skills learned in a maintenance probe conducted 4 weeks postintervention.
在先前的研究中,滞后强化程序已被证明是一种有效的干预措施,可用于向发育障碍个体教授言语和非言语反应变异性。在最近的研究中,变异性本身被认为是一种可强化的行为(苏萨和施林格,《言语行为分析》,第18卷,第125 - 130页,2012年)。滞后强化程序可通过使用要求反应与先前反应不同的条件来教授变异性。本研究扩展了苏萨和施林格(《言语行为分析》,第18卷,第125 - 130页,2012年)的研究,采用随机轮换的方式使用3个社会问题而非1个,并纳入了测试普遍性的探测。采用变化标准设计对一名被诊断为自闭症的11岁女性参与者的结果进行评估。在基线阶段,参与者很少有变化,只是机械地回答。在滞后1和滞后2阶段,通过使用模仿提示、视觉辅助工具和错误纠正程序,适当的可变言语反应有所增加。此外,结果还表明,参与者通过展示发出11个新颖的提示反应和13个自发反应的能力,学会了改变她的反应。此外,参与者能够在干预后4周进行的维持探测中保留所学技能。