Susa Carrie, Schlinger Henry D
California Unified Service Providers, L.L.C, California State University, Los Angeles.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03393113.
Research has shown that reinforcing novel behaviors can increase the number of different ways that an individual behaves (Goetz & Baer, 1973; Pryor, Haag, & O'Reilly, 1969). However, it was not until more recently that researchers began to consider variability to be a reinforceable operant in and of itself (Neuringer, 2002). More specifically, Neuringer suggested that variability can be taught using a Lag x schedule of reinforcement, in which x refers to the number of previous responses from which the current response must differ in order for reinforcement to occur (Page & Neuringer, 1985). The purpose of the present study was to extend one of the first studies of a Lag x schedule on verbal responses with human subjects (Lee, McComas, & Jawor, 2002), by increasing the lag criteria while attempting to address some of methodological limitations of the study. The participant was a 7-year-old male with autism. A changing criterion design was used and results showed that 3 novel responses were acquired and varied according to the lag schedule of reinforcement.
研究表明,强化新行为可以增加个体行为的不同方式的数量(戈茨和贝尔,1973年;普赖尔、哈格和奥赖利,1969年)。然而,直到最近研究人员才开始认为变异性本身就是一种可强化的操作性行为(诺伊林格,2002年)。更具体地说,诺伊林格认为可以使用滞后x强化程序来教授变异性,其中x指的是当前反应必须与之前的反应不同才能获得强化的反应次数(佩奇和诺伊林格,1985年)。本研究的目的是扩展关于人类受试者言语反应的滞后x程序的首批研究之一(李、麦科马斯和贾沃尔,2002年),通过增加滞后标准,同时试图解决该研究的一些方法学局限性。参与者是一名7岁的自闭症男性。采用了变化标准设计,结果表明获得了3种新反应,并根据强化的滞后程序而有所变化。