Department of Hematology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC/CIBERONC), Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Blood Rev. 2021 Jul;48:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100792. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was first described in 1959, since then major efforts have been made in order to understand its physiopathology and animal models have played a key role. Three steps, involving different pathways, have been recognised in either acute and chronic GvHD, identifying them as two distinct entities. In order to reduce GvHD incidence and severity, prophylactic measures were added to transplant protocols. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus an antimetabolite remains the standard of care. Better knowledge of GvHD pathophysiology has moved this field forward and nowadays different drugs are being used on a daily basis. Improving GvHD prophylaxis is a major goal as it would translate into less non-relapse mortality and better overall survival. As compared to CNI plus methotrexate the combination of CNI plus mycophenolate mophetil (MMF) allows us to obtain similar results in terms of GvHD incidence but a lower toxicity rate in terms of neutropenia or mucositis. The use of ATG has been related to a lower risk of acute and chronic GvHD in prospective randomized trials as well as the use of posttransplant Cyclophosphamide, with no or marginal impact on overall survival but with an improvement in GvHD-relapse free survival (GRFS). The use of sirolimus has been related to a lower risk of acute GvHD and significantly influenced overall survival in one prospective randomized trial. Other prospective trials have evaluated the use of receptors such as CCR5 or α4β7 to avoid T-cells trafficking into GvHD target organs, cytokine blockers or immune check point agonists. Also, epigenetic modifiers have shown promising results in phase II trials. Attention should be paid to graft-versus-leukemia, infections and immune recovery before bringing new prophylactic strategies to clinical practice. Although the list of novel agents for GvHD prophylaxis is growing, randomized trials are still lacking for many of them.
移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)于 1959 年首次被描述,此后,人们为了理解其发病机制做出了巨大努力,动物模型在此过程中发挥了关键作用。在急性和慢性 GvHD 中,已经认识到三个涉及不同途径的步骤,将其鉴定为两种不同的实体。为了降低 GvHD 的发生率和严重程度,移植方案中增加了预防措施。钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)加抗代谢物的联合仍然是标准治疗方法。对 GvHD 发病机制的更好认识推动了这一领域的发展,目前每天都在使用不同的药物。改善 GvHD 的预防是一个主要目标,因为它将转化为更低的非复发死亡率和更好的总体生存率。与 CNI 加甲氨蝶呤相比,CNI 加霉酚酸酯(MMF)的联合可以使我们在 GvHD 发生率方面获得相似的结果,但在中性粒细胞减少或粘膜炎方面毒性率较低。前瞻性随机试验表明,抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的使用与急性和慢性 GvHD 的风险降低有关,以及移植后环磷酰胺的使用,对总体生存率没有或仅有微小影响,但改善了 GvHD-无复发生存(GRFS)。西罗莫司的使用与急性 GvHD 的风险降低有关,并在一项前瞻性随机试验中显著影响了总体生存率。其他前瞻性试验评估了使用 CCR5 或 α4β7 受体来避免 T 细胞向 GvHD 靶器官转移、细胞因子阻滞剂或免疫检查点激动剂等方法。此外,表观遗传修饰剂在 II 期试验中显示出有希望的结果。在将新的预防策略引入临床实践之前,应注意移植物抗白血病、感染和免疫恢复。尽管用于 GvHD 预防的新型药物的清单在不断增加,但许多药物仍缺乏随机试验。