Leddin D J, Ray M, Dinda P K, Prokopiw I, Beck I T
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Gastroenterology. 1988 Mar;94(3):726-32. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90246-6.
To examine the relation between ethanol-induced microvascular and absorptive changes, we have investigated the effect of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 on the jejunal intraluminal plasma albumin loss (which was taken as a measure of microvascular changes) and the inhibition of water, sodium, and glucose transport caused by intraluminal ethanol. A group of 8 dogs received intravenously 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 at a dose of 0.1 microgram/kg as a bolus followed by 0.05 microgram/kg.hour for 2 h (prostaglandin-treated group). A second group of 8 dogs received no 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (untreated group). In each dog of both groups, one jejunal segment was perfused with an ethanol-free solution (control segment) and an adjacent segment was perfused with the same solution containing 6% (wt/vol) ethanol (ethanol-perfused segment). The albumin loss (mg/g dry gut wt.90 min, mean +/- SE) by the control and the ethanol-perfused segments was 0.76 +/- 0.23 and 8.29 +/- 1.27, respectively, in the untreated group, and 0.66 +/- 0.23 and 4.81 +/- 0.67, respectively, in the prostaglandin-treated group. The ethanol-induced increase in albumin loss was significant in both groups, but was significantly lower (p less than 0.05) in the prostaglandin-treated group than in the untreated group. Intraluminal ethanol depressed net water, sodium, and glucose transport by 74%, 52%, and 22%, respectively, in the untreated group, and by 92%, 65%, and 38%, respectively, in the prostaglandin-treated group. The magnitude of this depression did not differ significantly between the two groups. As 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 attenuated the ethanol-induced plasma albumin loss, but not the inhibition of water, sodium, or glucose transport, we conclude that the microvascular and the absorptive changes produced by ethanol are not mediated by the same mechanism.
为研究乙醇诱导的微血管和吸收功能变化之间的关系,我们研究了16,16-二甲基前列腺素E2对空肠腔内血浆白蛋白丢失(以此作为微血管变化的指标)以及腔内乙醇引起的水、钠和葡萄糖转运抑制的影响。一组8只犬静脉注射剂量为0.1微克/千克的16,16-二甲基前列腺素E2推注量,随后以0.05微克/千克·小时的剂量持续注射2小时(前列腺素治疗组)。另一组8只犬未接受16,16-二甲基前列腺素E2(未治疗组)。在两组的每只犬中,一个空肠段用无乙醇溶液灌注(对照段),相邻段用含6%(重量/体积)乙醇的相同溶液灌注(乙醇灌注段)。未治疗组中,对照段和乙醇灌注段的白蛋白丢失(毫克/克干肠重·90分钟,均值±标准误)分别为0.76±0.23和8.29±1.27,前列腺素治疗组分别为0.66±0.23和4.81±0.67。两组中乙醇诱导的白蛋白丢失增加均显著,但前列腺素治疗组显著低于未治疗组(p<0.05)。未治疗组中,腔内乙醇使水、钠和葡萄糖的净转运分别降低74%、52%和22%,前列腺素治疗组分别降低92%、65%和38%。两组间这种降低的幅度无显著差异。由于16,16-二甲基前列腺素E2减轻了乙醇诱导的血浆白蛋白丢失,但未减轻对水、钠或葡萄糖转运的抑制,我们得出结论,乙醇产生的微血管和吸收功能变化不是由同一机制介导的。