Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Stachura J, Krause W J, Gergely H
Gastroenterology. 1985 Jan;88(1 Pt 2):334-52. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(85)80188-8.
The aim of the present study was first to resolve controversies regarding the extent of prostaglandin protection ("cytoprotection") of the gastric mucosa against injury produced by 100% ethanol and second to determine time sequence and histologic, ultrastructural, and functional features of this protection. Fasted rats received intragastrically (A) 0.9% NaCl alone as a control, (B) 5 micrograms/kg of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 dissolved in 0.9% NaCl, and (C) 100 micrograms/kg of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 dissolved in 0.9% NaCl. Thirty minutes later, 2 ml of 100% ethanol was instilled. The gastric mucosa was assessed macroscopically, by quantitative histology, and by scanning and transmission electron microscopy for [3H]thymidine uptake, mitotic activity, ion fluxes, and gastric potential difference determined at several time intervals (between 10 min and 16 h) after ethanol administration. Between 10 min and 16 h after ethanol administration macroscopic necrosis involved 27% +/- 3% to 41% +/- 4% of the mucosal area in controls (group A), but necrosis was prevented in groups receiving 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (groups B and C). In the control group, histology and electron microscopy showed extensive disruption of the surface epithelium and deep necrosis (greater than 0.2 mm) involving greater than 46% +/- 4% of the mucosa between 15 min and 16 h after ethanol administration. Deep necrotic lesions were completely prevented by either dose of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (groups B and C). The mucosal proliferative zone was severely damaged in controls (68% +/- 5%) within the first hour after ethanol administration, whereas 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 protected the zone from damage (less than 5% +/- 1%). Neither dose of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 prevented the occurrence of initial (at 15-30 min) morphologic and functional disruption of the surface epithelium after ethanol administration. However, initial disruption of the surface epithelium by 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (groups B and C) was followed by migration of cells from the mucosal proliferative zone; the result was prompt restoration of the surface epithelium and resumption of its barrier and transport functions.
本研究的目的,一是解决关于前列腺素对胃黏膜免受100%乙醇所致损伤的保护(“细胞保护”)程度的争议,二是确定这种保护的时间顺序以及组织学、超微结构和功能特征。禁食的大鼠经胃内给予:(A)仅0.9%氯化钠作为对照;(B)溶解于0.9%氯化钠中的5微克/千克16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2;(C)溶解于0.9%氯化钠中的100微克/千克16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2。30分钟后,灌入2毫升100%乙醇。在给予乙醇后的几个时间间隔(10分钟至16小时),通过大体观察、定量组织学以及扫描和透射电子显微镜评估胃黏膜的[3H]胸腺嘧啶核苷摄取、有丝分裂活性、离子通量和胃电位差。给予乙醇后10分钟至16小时,对照组(A组)胃黏膜大体坏死面积达27%±3%至41%±4%,但接受16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2的组(B组和C组)坏死得到预防。对照组中,组织学和电子显微镜显示,给予乙醇后15分钟至16小时,表面上皮广泛破坏且深层坏死(大于0.2毫米)累及超过46%±4%的黏膜。两种剂量的16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2(B组和C组)均完全预防了深层坏死性病变。给予乙醇后第一小时内,对照组黏膜增殖区严重受损(68%±5%),而16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2保护该区域免受损伤(小于5%±1%)。两种剂量的16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2均不能预防给予乙醇后最初(15 - 30分钟)表面上皮的形态学和功能破坏。然而,16,16 - 二甲基前列腺素E2(B组和C组)引起的表面上皮最初破坏之后,细胞从黏膜增殖区迁移;结果是表面上皮迅速恢复并恢复其屏障和转运功能。