McFadden Brandon R, Malone Trey
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, USA.
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, USA.
Addict Behav. 2021 Apr;115:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106799. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
Despite heightened consumer interest in cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), little is known about public perceptions regarding their medical use and potential for abuse, particularly relative to commonly used medications. Using data from 1,050 U.S. adult respondents from a national survey conducted in 2019, this study found that more than half of respondents perceived CBD, THC, hemp, and marijuana as having medical use. They also perceived the potential for abuse of CBD, THC, hemp, and marijuana as significantly less than potential for abuse of commonly prescribed anti-anxiety and pain medications. At the nexus of medical use and potential abuse, public perceptions classified CBD and hemp as similar to over-the-counter pain relief medications such as Advil and Tylenol and did not classify marijuana as a Schedule I substance. Slightly more than 20% of respondents reported having consumed CBD and/or THC. CBD was consumed more than THC to reduce pain while THC was consumed more than CBD for recreation. There were no differences in the types of medications they were replacing with CBD and THC.
尽管消费者对大麻二酚(CBD)和四氢大麻酚(THC)等大麻素的兴趣日益浓厚,但对于公众对其医疗用途和滥用可能性的看法,尤其是与常用药物相比,人们知之甚少。本研究利用2019年全国性调查中1050名美国成年受访者的数据发现,超过一半的受访者认为CBD、THC、大麻和大麻具有医疗用途。他们还认为,CBD、THC、大麻和大麻的滥用可能性明显低于常用的抗焦虑和止痛药物的滥用可能性。在医疗用途和潜在滥用的交叉点上,公众认为CBD和大麻类似于布洛芬和泰诺等非处方止痛药物,并且没有将大麻归类为一类管制物质。略多于20%的受访者报告曾使用过CBD和/或THC。为减轻疼痛而使用CBD的人数多于使用THC的人数,而用于娱乐目的使用THC的人数多于使用CBD的人数。他们用CBD和THC替代的药物类型没有差异。