Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
J Neurol. 2021 May;268(5):1857-1866. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10354-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
To compare the effectiveness of a combined aerobic, strength, and flexibility training program with flexibility alone on disease-specific and health-related symptoms in ambulatory amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients.
Thirty-two ambulatory patients with ALS were equally randomized into a combined aerobic-strength intervention group or a stretching control group. The intervention period for both groups was identical, 12 consecutive weeks, two sessions per week. The combined intervention program consisted of aerobic training by recumbent cycling, flexibility achieved by stretching and passive exercises, and strength training via functional exercises. Patients in the control group performed basic stretching exercises of the upper and lower limb at home. Outcome measures included the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), respiratory function, mobility, fatigue, and quality of life and were collected 1-week prior to the intervention, after 6-weeks of training, and at the completion of the intervention.
Twenty-eight participants (17 males, 11 females); mean age (S.D.) = 58.5 (13.2) years; mean disease duration (S.D.) = 7.3 (12.0) years, completed the study. According to the group X time analysis, significant differences were found in respiratory function, mobility, and the ALSFRS-R in favor of the aerobic-strength group. These patients maintained their abilities, whereas, a significant decrease was observed in the flexibility training group. Scores of the SF-36 categories "physical functioning", "energy fatigue" and "wellbeing" were higher following the intervention in the aerobic-strength group compared with the stretching control group.
A 12-week combined aerobic and strength training program is far superior to flexibility alone in improving respiratory function, mobility, and wellbeing in ambulatory ALS patients.
比较有氧、力量和柔韧性综合训练与单纯柔韧性训练对门诊肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者特定疾病和健康相关症状的疗效。
32 例门诊 ALS 患者被随机等分为有氧-力量干预组或拉伸对照组。两组的干预周期相同,为连续 12 周,每周 2 次。综合干预方案包括卧式自行车有氧运动、伸展和被动运动柔韧性训练以及功能性运动力量训练。对照组患者在家中进行基本的上下肢拉伸运动。疗效评估指标包括肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评定量表修订版(ALSFRS-R)、呼吸功能、活动能力、疲劳程度和生活质量,并在干预前 1 周、6 周训练后和干预结束时进行收集。
28 名参与者(17 名男性,11 名女性);平均年龄(标准差)=58.5(13.2)岁;平均病程(标准差)=7.3(12.0)年,完成了研究。根据组间时间分析,有氧-力量组在呼吸功能、活动能力和 ALSFRS-R 方面的改善明显优于拉伸对照组。这些患者保持了他们的能力,而在柔韧性训练组中则观察到显著下降。与拉伸对照组相比,有氧-力量组的 SF-36 类别“身体机能”、“精力疲劳”和“幸福感”的评分在干预后更高。
与单纯柔韧性训练相比,为期 12 周的有氧和力量综合训练方案在改善门诊 ALS 患者的呼吸功能、活动能力和幸福感方面效果更佳。