Suppr超能文献

成人肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)疼痛管理策略的疗效:系统评价。

Efficacy of pain management strategies in adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Seedbed (Semineuros), Center of Neuroscience - Neurovitae, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

Neuroscience Research Group (Neuros), Center of Neuroscience - Neurovitae, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2024 Dec;45(12):5591-5604. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07643-0. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive muscle weakness. Presence of pain in ALS patients is heterogeneously reported in studies, and mostly underrepresented in symptom scales. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic modalities for pain management in patients with ALS. A systematic review was conducted in four databases; PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane-Ovid. Five randomized controlled clinical trials were included regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain management interventions in adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of ALS in whom pain was objectively evaluated. Risk of bias assessment was evaluated using the RoB2.0 tool. Eligible studies were reported as a descriptive analysis. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO ID: CRD42024495009. Five clinical trials regarding pain management strategies in ALS were eligible for analysis. Two out of five were non-pharmacological approaches whilst the remaining three provided pharmacological therapies. Of these, Mexiletine was efficient in terms of pain relief, particularly between 600 and 900 mg per day, whereas Mecasin showed no pain relief at both, high and low doses. Non-pharmacological therapies, such as exercise and osteopathic manual treatment also lacked efficacy in regard to pain management. Clinical trials focusing on pain management strategies for ALS patients are limited. Medical professionals, understandably focused on immediate life-threatening aspects, may inadvertently sideline the nuanced and intricate dimension of pain experienced by patients with ALS.

摘要

肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种神经退行性疾病,其特征是进行性肌肉无力。在研究中,ALS 患者的疼痛存在异质性报告,且在症状量表中大多代表性不足。本研究旨在评估用于 ALS 患者疼痛管理的药物和非药物治疗方法的疗效。在四个数据库中进行了系统评价:PubMed、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane-Ovid。纳入了五项关于药物和非药物疼痛管理干预措施的随机对照临床试验,这些试验涉及已确诊 ALS 的成年患者,且疼痛已得到客观评估。使用 RoB2.0 工具评估偏倚风险。合格研究报告为描述性分析。本系统评价已在 PROSPERO 登记,ID 号为:CRD42024495009。有五项关于 ALS 疼痛管理策略的临床试验符合分析条件。其中五项中的两项是非药物方法,其余三项则提供了药物治疗。其中,美西律在缓解疼痛方面有效,尤其是每天 600-900mg 时,而美卡西嗪在高、低剂量时均无缓解疼痛作用。非药物疗法,如运动和整骨手法治疗,在疼痛管理方面也缺乏疗效。针对 ALS 患者疼痛管理策略的临床试验受到限制。医务人员由于关注危及生命的直接问题,可能会无意中忽略 ALS 患者所经历的疼痛的细微而复杂的维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b239/11554732/9b9e84f19f2b/10072_2024_7643_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验