Queen´S Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Trust NHS, Romford, UK.
Unidad de Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Dec;35(6):1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00621-9. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
Contingency data was retrospectively collected to evaluate the historical and current ability to provide multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy under two conditions: total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and low dose halogenated anaesthesia (SEVO). 229 patients were monitored during carotid endarterectomy procedures under general anaesthesia between 2012 and 2020. 121 Patients were monitored with SEVO at a minimum alveolar concentration less than 0.7 and 108 were monitored using TIVA, according to common anaesthetic practice standards in our hospital across the years. Multimodality IONM was established with electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials. As compared to TIVA, patients monitored with SEVO showed significantly higher motor evoked potential thresholds (313.52 ± 77.74 SEVO and 218.93 V ± 103.2 V TIVA p < 0.05) and lower reproducibility. Electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials showed no significant differences among the groups. When using SEVO, multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy could mask or miss a motor isolated change in patients in spite of low dose minimum alveolar concentration and of apparently adequate electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials for monitoring. Given these difficulties, we believe the chronological transfer to TIVA could have improved our ability to establish multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy in recent times.
回顾性收集了应急数据,以评估在两种情况下(全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)和低剂量卤代麻醉(SEVO))进行颈动脉内膜切除术时提供多模态术中神经生理监测的历史和当前能力:在 2012 年至 2020 年间,229 名患者在全身麻醉下接受颈动脉内膜切除术期间接受了监测。121 名患者在最低肺泡浓度低于 0.7 时使用 SEVO 进行监测,108 名患者根据医院多年来的常规麻醉实践标准使用 TIVA 进行监测。多模态 IONM 采用脑电图、体感诱发电位和运动诱发电位建立。与 TIVA 相比,使用 SEVO 监测的患者显示出明显更高的运动诱发电位阈值(313.52±77.74 SEVO 和 218.93 V±103.2 V TIVA p<0.05)和更低的可重复性。脑电图和体感诱发电位在各组之间没有显著差异。当使用 SEVO 时,尽管最低肺泡浓度较低,且脑电图和体感诱发电位显然足以进行监测,但多模态术中神经生理监测仍可能掩盖或错过颈动脉内膜切除术中患者的孤立运动变化。鉴于这些困难,我们认为从历史上看,向 TIVA 的转变可能会提高我们在最近时期建立颈动脉内膜切除术多模态术中神经生理监测的能力。