• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗(低风险)导管原位癌患者:我们能从真实世界癌症登记数据中学到什么?

Treating (low-risk) DCIS patients: What can we learn from real-world cancer registry evidence?

作者信息

Byng Danalyn, Retèl Valesca P, Schaapveld Michael, Wesseling Jelle, van Harten Wim H

机构信息

Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06042-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-06042-1
PMID:33389397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062323/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Results from active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will not be available for > 10 years. A model based on real-world data (RWD) can demonstrate the comparative impact of non-intervention for women with low-risk features.

METHODS

Multi-state models were developed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data for three treatment strategies (no local treatment, breast conserving surgery [BCS], BCS + radiotherapy [RT]), and for women with DCIS low-risk features. Eligible cases included women aged ≥ 40 years, diagnosed with primary DCIS between 1992 and 2016. Five mutually exclusive health states were modelled: DCIS, ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) ≤ 5 years and > 5 years post-DCIS diagnosis, contralateral IBC, death preceded by and death not preceded by IBC. Propensity score-weighted Cox models assessed effects of treatment, age, diagnosis year, grade, ER status, and race.

RESULTS

Data on n = 85,982 women were used. Increased risk of iIBC ≤ 5 years post-DCIS was demonstrated for ages 40-49 (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.86, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.34-2.57 compared to age 50-69), grade 3 lesions (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.05-1.91) compared to grade 2, lesion size ≥ 2 cm (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.25), and Black race (HR 2.52, 95%CI 1.83-3.48 compared to White). According to the multi-state model, propensity score-matched women with low-risk features who had not died or experienced any subsequent breast event by 10 years, had a predicted probability of iIBC as first event of 3.02% for no local treatment, 1.66% for BCS, and 0.42% for BCS+RT.

CONCLUSION

RWD from the SEER registry showed that women with primary DCIS and low-risk features demonstrate minimal differences by treatment strategy in experiencing subsequent breast events. There may be opportunity to de-escalate treatment for certain women with low-risk features: Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women aged 50-69 at diagnosis, with ER+, grade 1 + 2, < 2 cm DCIS lesions.

摘要

目的

导管原位癌(DCIS)主动监测试验的结果在10多年内都无法获得。基于真实世界数据(RWD)的模型可以证明对具有低风险特征的女性不进行干预的相对影响。

方法

使用监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(SEER)数据,针对三种治疗策略(不进行局部治疗、保乳手术[BCS]、BCS+放疗[RT])以及具有DCIS低风险特征的女性开发多状态模型。符合条件的病例包括年龄≥40岁、在1992年至2016年期间被诊断为原发性DCIS的女性。对五个相互排斥的健康状态进行建模:DCIS、DCIS诊断后同侧浸润性乳腺癌(iIBC)≤5年和>5年、对侧IBC、IBC之前的死亡和IBC之后的死亡。倾向评分加权Cox模型评估治疗、年龄、诊断年份、分级、雌激素受体(ER)状态和种族的影响。

结果

使用了n = 85,982名女性的数据。结果显示,与50-69岁相比,40-49岁的女性在DCIS诊断后≤5年发生iIBC的风险增加(风险比[HR] 1.86,95%置信区间[CI] 1.34-2.57);与2级病变相比,3级病变发生iIBC的风险增加(HR 1.42,95%CI 1.05-1.91);病变大小≥2 cm的女性发生iIBC的风险增加(HR 1.66,95%CI 1.23-2.25);黑人女性发生iIBC的风险增加(与白人相比,HR 2.52,95%CI 1.83-3.48)。根据多状态模型,对于具有低风险特征、10年内未死亡或未经历任何后续乳腺事件的倾向评分匹配女性,以iIBC作为首个事件的预测概率,不进行局部治疗为3.02%,BCS为1.66%,BCS+RT为0.42%。

结论

SEER登记处的RWD显示,原发性DCIS且具有低风险特征的女性在经历后续乳腺事件方面,不同治疗策略之间的差异极小。对于某些具有低风险特征的女性,可能有机会降低治疗强度:诊断时年龄为50-69岁的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人女性,ER阳性,1+2级,DCIS病变<2 cm。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/e5b73a8c3cf4/10549_2020_6042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/123168a17433/10549_2020_6042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/27426c71c596/10549_2020_6042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/10242a2c6a1f/10549_2020_6042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/e5b73a8c3cf4/10549_2020_6042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/123168a17433/10549_2020_6042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/27426c71c596/10549_2020_6042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/10242a2c6a1f/10549_2020_6042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deac/8062323/e5b73a8c3cf4/10549_2020_6042_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Treating (low-risk) DCIS patients: What can we learn from real-world cancer registry evidence?治疗(低风险)导管原位癌患者:我们能从真实世界癌症登记数据中学到什么?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06042-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women.导管原位癌治疗后同侧和对侧浸润性乳腺癌的后续风险:10,090名女性人群队列中的发病率及放疗效果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3973-y. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
3
Long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral lesions after surgery with or without radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌保乳手术或不保乳手术后同侧病变的长期风险。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(10):1443-1449. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01496-6. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
The effects of contemporary treatment of DCIS on the risk of developing an ipsilateral invasive Breast cancer (iIBC) in the Dutch population.当代治疗 DCIS 对荷兰人群同侧浸润性乳腺癌 (iIBC) 发病风险的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;204(1):61-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07168-8. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Invasive recurrence after breast conserving treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the Netherlands: time trends and the association with tumour grade.荷兰保乳治疗乳腺导管原位癌的侵袭性复发:时间趋势及与肿瘤分级的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(5):852-859. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02785-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Association of Regional Intensity of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment With Likelihood of Breast Preservation.区域导管原位癌治疗强度与保乳可能性的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):101-104. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2164.
7
Clinicopathological Risk Factors for an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after Ductal Carcinoma -A Nested Case-Control Study.导管癌浸润性乳腺癌复发的临床病理危险因素-巢式病例对照研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 1;24(15):3593-3601. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0201. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.多灶微浸润与保乳手术后导管原位癌女性浸润性局部复发风险增加相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05364-z. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
9
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌诊断后的乳腺癌死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510.
10
Association of Radiotherapy With Survival in Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Lumpectomy or Mastectomy.保乳术或乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌的女性中放疗与生存的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1100.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of high- and low-risk groups for ipsilateral recurrence within 10 years after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ and personalized treatment: a retrospective study.保乳手术治疗导管原位癌后10年内同侧复发的高风险和低风险组识别及个体化治疗:一项回顾性研究
Gland Surg. 2025 Jul 31;14(7):1213-1229. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-100. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
The DCIS-IBC guide board on predicting postoperative upgrading in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical insights from a multicenter study.乳腺导管原位癌术后升级预测的DCIS-IBC指南委员会:一项多中心研究的临床见解
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07763-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.美国少数族裔的癌症健康差距。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(2):315-332. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01038-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study.英格兰女性乳房筛查中导管原位癌后浸润性乳腺癌和乳腺癌死亡率:1988-2014 年的基于人群的观察性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 27;369:m1570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1570.
3
Modeling the natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ based on population data.
Treatment and Outcome of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ for the German Federal States Berlin and Brandenburg in the Period 2007-2020.
2007年至2020年期间德国联邦州柏林和勃兰登堡导管原位癌的治疗与转归
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2025 Jan 30;85(6):620-630. doi: 10.1055/a-2505-1682. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Multiplex characterization of circulating tumor cells from ductal carcinoma in situ patients suggests early tumor dissemination.导管原位癌患者循环肿瘤细胞的多重表征提示肿瘤早期播散。
Cancer Lett. 2025 Jul 28;623:217703. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217703. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
An early economic evaluation of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma .低风险导管癌主动监测的早期经济学评估
Future Oncol. 2024 Dec;20(40):3451-3462. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2421152. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
6
Duration of Endocrine Treatment for DCIS impacts second events: Insights from a large cohort of cases at two academic medical centers.导管原位癌内分泌治疗的持续时间对二次事件有影响:来自两个学术医学中心的大量病例队列的见解。
Res Sq. 2024 Jan 11:rs.3.rs-3403438. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3403438/v1.
7
Growth Dynamics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Recapitulate Normal Breast Development.导管原位癌的生长动力学重现正常乳腺发育过程。
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 2:2023.10.01.560370. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.01.560370.
8
Women's views about current and future management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS): A mixed-methods study.女性对导管原位癌(DCIS)当前和未来管理的看法:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 21;18(7):e0288972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288972. eCollection 2023.
9
Should low-risk DCIS lose the cancer label? An evidence review.低危 DCIS 是否应该去掉“癌症”标签?一项证据回顾。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(3):415-433. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06934-y. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
10
Changes in breast cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Dutch population-based study.COVID-19 大流行期间乳腺癌治疗的变化:一项荷兰基于人群的研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(1):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06732-y. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
基于人群数据对导管原位癌自然史进行建模。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 May 27;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01287-6.
4
Valuing preferences for treating screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ.重视治疗屏幕检测到的导管原位癌的偏好。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Dec;123:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.026. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
5
Re: Cancer Outcomes in DCIS Patients Without Locoregional Treatment.关于:未接受局部区域治疗的导管原位癌患者的癌症转归情况
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Feb 1;112(2):214-215. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz118.
6
Incidence of Ductal Carcinoma in the United States, 2000-2014.美国 2000-2014 年导管癌发病情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Aug;28(8):1316-1323. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1262. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Predictors of an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after DCIS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.DCIS 后浸润性乳腺癌复发的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):835-845. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0976. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).COMET(手术与监测和内分泌治疗比较)试验:一项针对低危导管原位癌(DCIS)的 III 期随机对照临床试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 12;9(3):e026797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.
9
Cancer Outcomes in DCIS Patients Without Locoregional Treatment.DCIS 患者未经局部区域治疗的癌症结局。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):952-960. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy220.
10
Precancer Atlas to Drive Precision Prevention Trials.癌前图谱推动精准预防试验。
Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 1;77(7):1510-1541. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2346.