Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Research Unit, Chronic Pain Unit, Dr. Negrín University Hospital, Calle Barranco de la Ballena, s/n, 35019, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(13):16517-16531. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12036-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
The greatest challenge the world is facing today is to win the battle against COVID-19 pandemic as soon as possible. Until a vaccine is available, personal protection, social distancing, and disinfection are the main tools against SARS-CoV-2. Although it is quite infectious, the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is an enveloped virus that is relatively fragile because its protective fatty layer is sensitive to heat, ultraviolet radiation, and certain chemicals. However, heat and liquid treatments can damage some materials, and ultraviolet light is not efficient in shaded areas, so other disinfection alternatives are required to allow safe re-utilization of materials and spaces. As of this writing, evidences are still accumulating for the use of ozone gas as a disinfectant for sanitary materials and ambient disinfection in indoor areas. This paper reviews the most relevant results of virus disinfection by the application of gaseous ozone. The review covers disinfection treatments of both air and surfaces carried out in different volumes, which varies from small boxes and controlled chambers to larger rooms, as a base to develop future ozone protocols against COVID-19. Published papers have been critically analyzed to evaluate trends in the required ozone dosages, as a function of relative humidity (RH), contact time, and viral strains. The data have been classified depending on the disinfection objective and the volume and type of the experimental set-up. Based on these data, conservative dosages and times to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 are estimated. In small chambers, 10-20 mg ozone/m over 10 to 50 min can be sufficient to significantly reduce the virus load of personal protection equipment. In large rooms, 30 to 50 mg ozone/m would be required for treatments of 20-30 min. Maximum antiviral activity of ozone is achieved at high humidity, while the same ozone concentrations under low RH could result inefficient. At these ozone levels, safety protocols must be strictly followed. These data can be used for reducing significantly the viral load although for assuring a safe disinfection, the effective dosages under different conditions need to be confirmed with experimental data.
当今世界面临的最大挑战是尽快赢得抗击 COVID-19 大流行的战斗。在疫苗问世之前,个人防护、社交距离和消毒是对抗 SARS-CoV-2 的主要手段。虽然它具有很强的传染性,但 SARS-CoV-2 病毒本身是一种包膜病毒,由于其保护性脂肪层对热、紫外线辐射和某些化学物质敏感,因此相对脆弱。然而,高温和液体处理会损坏某些材料,而紫外线在阴暗区域效率不高,因此需要其他消毒替代品来允许安全地重新利用材料和空间。截至本文撰写之时,仍在不断积累有关臭氧气体作为卫生材料消毒剂和室内环境空气消毒的证据。本文综述了应用气态臭氧对病毒进行消毒的最相关结果。综述涵盖了在不同体积下对空气和表面进行的消毒处理,从小盒子和受控室到更大的房间不等,以此为基础制定针对 COVID-19 的未来臭氧方案。对已发表的论文进行了批判性分析,以评估所需臭氧剂量随相对湿度 (RH)、接触时间和病毒株的变化趋势。数据根据消毒目的以及实验装置的体积和类型进行了分类。基于这些数据,估算了灭活 SARS-CoV-2 的保守剂量和时间。在小室中,10-20mg/m³臭氧作用 10-50min 即可显著降低个人防护装备上的病毒载量。在大房间中,处理 20-30min 需要 30-50mg/m³臭氧。臭氧的最大抗病毒活性在高湿度下实现,而在低 RH 下相同的臭氧浓度可能效率较低。在这些臭氧水平下,必须严格遵守安全协议。尽管这些数据可以显著降低病毒载量,但为了确保安全消毒,仍需要用实验数据来确认不同条件下的有效剂量。