• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在真实世界患者人群中,使用预扩张、测量和后扩张方案的 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold using predilation, sizing, and postdilation protocol in a real-world patient population.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, İstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jan;49(1):40-50. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.99249.

DOI:10.5543/tkda.2020.99249
PMID:33390583
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been a disappointment in the evolution of drug-eluting stents used in percutaneous coronary intervention because an excessive number of thrombotic complications have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of the Absorb BVS in patients treated using a predilation, proper sizing, and post-dilation implantation technique.

METHODS

The records of 110 patients who had a total of 150 Absorb BVSs implanted were retrospectively analyzed. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization were studied using quantitative coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Of the study population, 80% were male and the mean age was 60±11.3 years. The most common diagnosis was stable angina (84%). The median length of follow-up was 53 months (range: 46-59 months). The rate of predilation and postdilation was 100%, and 95%, respectively. The 4-year rate of MACEs was 20%: cardiac death in 3 patients (2.7%), target vessel MI in 9 (8.2%), and target lesion revascularization in 20 (18.2%). Definite device thrombosis occurred in 6 of 110 patients (5.5%). One case of very late scaffold thrombosis was observed at 47 months. A small BVS diameter (2.5 mm) was found to be the most powerful independent predictor of a MACE (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Absorb BVS was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including late and very late device thrombosis, despite the use of a good implementation protocol.

摘要

目的

生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用的药物洗脱支架的发展中令人失望,因为报道了大量的血栓并发症。本研究旨在评估在采用预扩张、适当尺寸和后扩张植入技术治疗的患者中 Absorb BVS 的长期临床结果。

方法

回顾性分析了 110 例共植入 150 枚 Absorb BVS 的患者记录。使用定量冠状动脉造影术研究主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,定义为心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建的复合事件。

结果

研究人群中 80%为男性,平均年龄为 60±11.3 岁。最常见的诊断是稳定型心绞痛(84%)。中位随访时间为 53 个月(范围:46-59 个月)。预扩张和后扩张的比例分别为 100%和 95%。4 年的 MACE 发生率为 20%:3 例(2.7%)心脏死亡,9 例(8.2%)靶血管 MI,20 例(18.2%)靶病变血运重建。110 例患者中有 6 例(5.5%)发生明确的器械血栓形成。1 例支架血栓形成发生在 47 个月时。小 BVS 直径(2.5mm)是 MACE 的最强独立预测因素(p=0.05)。

结论

尽管使用了良好的实施方案,但 Absorb BVS 仍与不良事件风险增加相关,包括晚期和极晚期器械血栓形成。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold using predilation, sizing, and postdilation protocol in a real-world patient population.在真实世界患者人群中,使用预扩张、测量和后扩张方案的 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架的长期结果。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jan;49(1):40-50. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.99249.
2
Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a real-world population: A single-center experience.ABSOB生物可吸收血管支架植入术在真实世界人群中的中期临床结果:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Dec;16(8):461-4. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
3
A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.一种采用生物可吸收血管支架和药物洗脱支架治疗复杂冠状动脉病变的混合策略。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(5S1):S4-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Twelve-Month Outcomes With a Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold: Results of the ESHC-BVS Registry at Two Australian Centers.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架的12个月结果:澳大利亚两个中心的ESHC-BVS注册研究结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Aug;28(8):316-22. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
5
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients.接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中长期结局:哥廷根生物可吸收血管支架注册研究数据,主要来自急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;234:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.069. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent - A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.在日本通过 5 年的随机比较,可吸收生物可降解血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的长期结果。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):733-741. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1184. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架和生物雷帕霉素洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架的比较:随机对照EVERBIO II试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Jan 7;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-9.
9
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
10
Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架置入后不良事件的时间趋势:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2017 May 30;135(22):2145-2154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028479.