Tumanova Victoria, Wilder Blair, Gregoire Julia, Baratta Michaela, Razza Rachel
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Department of Human Development and Family Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 16;14:600790. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.600790. eCollection 2020.
This experimental cross-sectional research study examined the emotional reactivity and emotion regulation in preschool-age children who do (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS) by assessing their psychophysiological response during rest and while viewing pictures from the International Affective Picture System (Lang et al., 2008). Participants were 18 CWS (16 boys and two girls; mean age 4 years, 5 months) and 18 age- and gender-matched CWNS. Participants' psychophysiological responses were measured during two baselines and two picture viewing conditions. Skin conductance level (SCL) and heart rate were measured to assess emotional reactivity. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) was measured to assess emotional regulation. Participants' shyness and executive function were assessed via parent report and considered for their effects on participants' psychophysiological responses. First, CWNS and CWS did not differ in their initial baseline SCL, heart rate, or RSA, but all participants had higher SCL and lower RSA in the second baseline, subsequent to the first challenge condition, compared to the first baseline. Second, during the challenge conditions, CWS did not differ from CWNS in their SCL, but showed a significantly higher heart rate than CWNS. Third, CWS exhibited a significantly lower RSA during the challenge conditions compared to CWNS. Lastly, the temperamental quality of shyness was associated with preschool-age children's SCL, such that participants who were rated higher in shyness had a higher SCL during the challenge conditions. Participants' executive function had a marginally significant effect on the RSA, such that the participants who had higher executive function composite scores exhibited lower RSA during the challenge conditions. Our findings suggest that CWS and CWNS did not differ in their emotional reactivity and emotional regulation abilities at rest. During challenge conditions, however, CWS tended to be more emotionally reactive, as indicated by a higher heart rate, and also employed more emotional regulation, indexed by a greater decrease in RSA, compared to CWNS. Preschool-age children's behavior is largely dominated by reactivity, but there is the emergence of regulation, which can help children adjust to various contextual demands. For CWS who are more emotionally reactive, regulatory skills may be particularly critical to their prognosis and treatment.
这项实验性横断面研究通过评估学龄前口吃儿童(CWS)和非口吃儿童(CWNS)在休息时以及观看国际情感图片系统(Lang等人,2008年)中的图片时的心理生理反应,来考察他们的情绪反应性和情绪调节能力。参与者包括18名CWS儿童(16名男孩和2名女孩;平均年龄4岁5个月)以及18名年龄和性别匹配的CWNS儿童。在两个基线期和两种图片观看条件下测量了参与者的心理生理反应。测量皮肤电导水平(SCL)和心率以评估情绪反应性。测量呼吸性窦性心律不齐(RSA)以评估情绪调节能力。通过家长报告评估参与者的害羞程度和执行功能,并考虑它们对参与者心理生理反应的影响。首先,CWNS和CWS在初始基线SCL、心率或RSA方面没有差异,但与第一个基线期相比,在第一个挑战条件后的第二个基线期,所有参与者的SCL更高,RSA更低。其次,在挑战条件下,CWS和CWNS的SCL没有差异,但CWS的心率显著高于CWNS。第三,与CWNS相比,CWS在挑战条件下的RSA显著更低。最后,害羞的气质特质与学龄前儿童的SCL相关,即害羞评分较高的参与者在挑战条件下的SCL更高。参与者的执行功能对RSA有边缘显著影响,即执行功能综合得分较高的参与者在挑战条件下的RSA更低。我们的研究结果表明,CWS和CWNS在休息时的情绪反应性和情绪调节能力没有差异。然而,在挑战条件下,CWS往往情绪反应更强,表现为心率更高,并且与CWNS相比,通过RSA更大幅度的下降表明其采用了更多的情绪调节。学龄前儿童的行为在很大程度上由反应性主导,但也出现了调节能力,这有助于儿童适应各种情境需求。对于情绪反应更强的CWS儿童来说,调节技能可能对他们的预后和治疗尤为关键。