Gillet Sophie, Barbu Cristina Anca, Poncelet Martine
Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 17;11:587574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587574. eCollection 2020.
Advantages in diverse aspects of cognitive functioning have been reported in early bilinguals (Bialystok, 2011) as well as in children frequenting an early bilingual immersion school program (Nicolay and Poncelet, 2015). However, during the last decade, some studies failed to replicate these advantages. Currently, the presence of cognitive benefits in children frequenting an immersion program remains debated. The lack of consistency between the studies could come from the fact that time spent by children within the immersion program is variable from one study to the other and that studies used different tasks to assess the same cognitive function. The main aim of the present study was to determine how time spent in immersion affects the emergence of cognitive advantages along the primary schooling. We compared 196 immersed Dutch-speaking children since they were 5 years old and 195 non-immersed French-speaking children, from different grades of the primary schooling (i.e., at 6, 7, 8, and 12 years old) by using the same attentional and executive tasks as those used in previous studies having shown a bilingual advantage. Furthermore, these groups were matched on a set of variables known to influence cognitive functioning. After 1, 2, and 3 years of enrolment in this program, performances of immersed compared to non-immersed children did not differ for any task. However, after 6 years, immersed children outperformed non-immersed children on the cognitive flexibility and the working memory tasks. These results show that, in French-speaking children immersed in Dutch, cognitive advantages could depend on the length of time spent in immersion since they are not present at the beginning (after 1, 2, and 3 years) but seem to emerge at the end of it (after 6 years). In contrast, in previous studies conducted in English immersion, advantages appear at the beginning of the primary schooling but are absent at the end of it. Furthermore, these results suggest that the emergence of cognitive advantages may vary depending on the second language learned. The results are discussed in terms of linguistic characteristics and status of the languages at stake.
早期双语者(比亚韦斯托克,2011年)以及就读于早期双语沉浸式学校项目的儿童(尼古拉和庞塞莱,2015年)在认知功能的多个方面都表现出优势。然而,在过去十年中,一些研究未能重复这些优势。目前,就读于沉浸式项目的儿童是否具有认知益处仍存在争议。研究结果缺乏一致性可能是因为不同研究中儿童在沉浸式项目中的时间各不相同,而且研究使用了不同的任务来评估相同的认知功能。本研究的主要目的是确定在沉浸式项目中的时间如何影响小学阶段认知优势的出现。我们比较了196名从5岁起就开始沉浸式学习荷兰语的儿童和195名未参与沉浸式学习的法语儿童,这些儿童来自小学不同年级(即6岁、7岁、8岁和12岁),使用了与之前显示双语优势的研究相同的注意力和执行任务。此外,这些组在一组已知会影响认知功能的变量上进行了匹配。在该项目入学1年、2年和3年后,参与沉浸式学习的儿童与未参与沉浸式学习的儿童在任何任务上的表现都没有差异。然而,6年后,参与沉浸式学习的儿童在认知灵活性和工作记忆任务上的表现优于未参与沉浸式学习的儿童。这些结果表明,对于沉浸式学习荷兰语的法语儿童来说,认知优势可能取决于沉浸式学习的时间长度——优势在开始时(1年、2年和3年后)并不存在,但似乎在结束时(6年后)出现。相比之下,在之前关于英语沉浸式学习的研究中,优势出现在小学阶段开始时,但在结束时消失。此外,这些结果表明,认知优势的出现可能因所学的第二语言而异。我们将根据所涉及语言的语言特征和地位来讨论这些结果。