Suppr超能文献

利用自下而上的蛋白质组学提高植物跨膜蛋白的鉴定和覆盖率。

Improving the Identification and Coverage of Plant Transmembrane Proteins in Using Bottom-Up Proteomics.

作者信息

Lee Han Chung, Carroll Adam, Crossett Ben, Connolly Angela, Batarseh Amani, Djordjevic Michael A

机构信息

Division of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, College of Medicine, Biology and the Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

ANU Joint Mass Spectrometry Facility, Research School of Chemistry, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 18;11:595726. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.595726. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Plant transmembrane proteins (TMPs) are essential for normal cellular homeostasis, nutrient exchange, and responses to environmental cues. Commonly used bottom-up proteomic approaches fail to identify a broad coverage of peptide fragments derived from TMPs. Here, we used mass spectrometry (MS) to compare the effectiveness of two solubilization and protein cleavage methods to identify shoot-derived TMPs from the legume We compared a urea solubilization, trypsin Lys-C (UR-TLC) cleavage method to a formic acid solubilization, cyanogen bromide and trypsin Lys-C (FA-CTLC) cleavage method. We assessed the effectiveness of these methods by (i) comparing total protein identifications, (ii) determining how many TMPs were identified, and (iii) defining how many peptides incorporate all, or part, of transmembrane domains (TMD) sequences. The results show that the FA-CTLC method identified nine-fold more TMDs, and enriched more hydrophobic TMPs than the UR-TLC method. FA-CTLC identified more TMPs, particularly transporters, whereas UR-TLC preferentially identified TMPs with one TMD, particularly signaling proteins. The results suggest that combining plant membrane purification techniques with both the FA-CTLC and UR-TLC methods will achieve a more complete identification and coverage of TMPs.

摘要

植物跨膜蛋白(TMPs)对于正常细胞内稳态、营养物质交换以及对环境信号的响应至关重要。常用的自下而上蛋白质组学方法无法全面鉴定源自TMPs的肽段。在此,我们使用质谱(MS)比较两种溶解和蛋白质裂解方法从豆科植物的地上部分鉴定TMPs的有效性。我们将尿素溶解、胰蛋白酶Lys-C(UR-TLC)裂解方法与甲酸溶解、溴化氰和胰蛋白酶Lys-C(FA-CTLC)裂解方法进行了比较。我们通过以下方式评估这些方法的有效性:(i)比较总蛋白质鉴定结果,(ii)确定鉴定出的TMPs数量,以及(iii)确定有多少肽段包含全部或部分跨膜结构域(TMD)序列。结果表明,与UR-TLC方法相比,FA-CTLC方法鉴定出的TMDs数量多九倍,并且富集了更多疏水性TMPs。FA-CTLC鉴定出更多的TMPs,尤其是转运蛋白,而UR-TLC则优先鉴定具有一个TMD的TMPs,尤其是信号蛋白。结果表明,将植物膜纯化技术与FA-CTLC和UR-TLC方法相结合,将能够更全面地鉴定和覆盖TMPs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0936/7775423/49571907f7b7/fpls-11-595726-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验