Tao Hao-Yun, Zhan Ze-Jiang, Qiu Wen-Ze, Liao Kai, Yuan Ya-Wei, Yuan Tai-Ze, Zheng Rong-Hui
Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510045, Guangdong, P. R. China.
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):18-27. doi: 10.7150/jca.49944. eCollection 2021.
: To investigate the clinical value of induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with TP in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). : A total of 544 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC that was newly diagnosed from January 2009 to December 2015 were included in this study. Among these patients, 251 were treated with TP induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT with cisplatin (DDP) alone (TP + DDP group), 167 were treated with TP followed by CCRT with TP (TP + TP group), and 126 were treated with docetaxel, DDP and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CCRT with DDP alone (TPF + DDP group). Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. : Survival analysis showed that the 5-year OS, PFS and DMFS rates in the TP + DDP group were significantly lower than those in the TP + TP group after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate analysis revealed that CCRT with TP was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS and DMFS. During CCRT, the incidence rates of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, oral mucositis, leukocytopenia and neutropenia were significantly increased in the TP + TP group compared with the TP + DDP group (all < 0.05). To further explore the value of TP + TP, we performed PSM again with the TPF + DDP group. After PSM, there were 100 patients in each group. Survival analysis showed no significant differences in the 5-year OS, PFS, DMFS and LRRFS rates between the two groups. During IC and CCRT, the rate of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting in the TPF + DDP group was higher than that in the TP+TP group (9.0% 2.0%, = 0.030; 18.0% 8.0%, = 0.036, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was found between the two groups (all > 0.05). : TP + TP can reduce the distant metastasis of locoregionally advanced NPC and improve OS compared with TP + DDP; TP + TP has the same effect as TPF + DDP and is clinically feasible.
探讨多西他赛联合顺铂(TP)诱导化疗后序贯TP同步放化疗在局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)中的临床价值。
本研究纳入了2009年1月至2015年12月新诊断的544例局部晚期NPC患者。其中,251例接受TP诱导化疗后序贯单纯顺铂(DDP)同步放化疗(TP + DDP组),167例接受TP诱导化疗后序贯TP同步放化疗(TP + TP组),126例接受多西他赛、DDP和氟尿嘧啶(TPF)诱导化疗后序贯单纯DDP同步放化疗(TPF + DDP组)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型分析总生存(OS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)、无进展生存(PFS)和无局部区域复发生存(LRRFS)。
生存分析显示,倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,TP + DDP组的5年OS、PFS和DMFS率显著低于TP + TP组。多因素分析显示,TP同步放化疗是OS、PFS和DMFS的独立预后因素。同步放化疗期间,TP + TP组3/4级恶心/呕吐、口腔黏膜炎、白细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少的发生率均显著高于TP + DDP组(均P < 0.05)。为进一步探讨TP + TP方案的价值,我们将TPF + DDP组与之再次进行PSM。PSM后,每组各有100例患者。生存分析显示,两组的5年OS、PFS、DMFS和LRRFS率无显著差异。诱导化疗和同步放化疗期间,TPF + DDP组3/4级恶心/呕吐的发生率高于TP + TP组(分别为9.0%对2.0%,P = 0.030;18.0%对8.0%,P = 0.036)。两组3/4级血液学毒性发生率无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。
与TP + DDP相比,TP + TP方案可降低局部晚期NPC的远处转移并提高OS;TP + TP方案与TPF + DDP方案疗效相当,且具有临床可行性。