Ohs Nicholas, Collins Caitlyn J, Atkins Penny R
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Osteoporosis, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Bone Rep. 2020 Aug 24;13:100711. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100711. eCollection 2020 Dec.
High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed-tomography (HR-pQCT) has the potential to become a powerful clinical assessment and diagnostic tool. Given the recent improvements in image resolution, from 82 to 61 μm, this technology may be used to accurately quantify in vivo bone microarchitecture, a key biomarker of degenerative bone diseases. However, computational methods to assess bone microarchitecture were developed for micro computed tomography (micro-CT), a higher-resolution technology only available for ex vivo studies, and validation of these computational analysis techniques against the gold-standard micro-CT has been inconsistent and incomplete. Herein, we review methods for segmentation of bone compartments and microstructure, quantification of bone morphology, and estimation of mechanical strength using finite-element analysis, highlighting the need throughout for improved standardization across the field. Studies have relied on homogenous datasets for validation, which does not allow for robust comparisons between methods. Consequently, the adaptation and validation of novel segmentation approaches has been slow to non-existent, with most studies still using the manufacturer's segmentation for morphometric analysis despite the existence of better performing alternative approaches. The promising accuracy of HR-pQCT for capturing morphometric indices is overshadowed by considerable variability in outcomes between studies. For finite element analysis (FEA) methods, the use of disparate material models and FEA tools has led to a fragmented ability to assess mechanical bone strength with HR-pQCT. Further, the scarcity of studies comparing 62 μm HR-pQCT to the gold standard micro-CT leaves the validation of this imaging modality incomplete. This review revealed that without standardization, the capabilities of HR-pQCT cannot be adequately assessed. The need for a public, extendable, heterogeneous dataset of HR-pQCT and corresponding gold-standard micro-CT images, which would allow HR-pQCT users to benchmark existing and novel methods and select optimal methods depending on the scientific question and data at hand, is now evident. With more recent advancements in HR-pQCT, the community must learn from its past and provide properly validated technologies to ensure that HR-pQCT can truly provide value in patient diagnosis and care.
高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)有潜力成为一种强大的临床评估和诊断工具。鉴于图像分辨率最近从82微米提高到了61微米,这项技术可用于准确量化体内骨微结构,而骨微结构是退行性骨疾病的关键生物标志物。然而,评估骨微结构的计算方法是为微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)开发的,这是一种仅适用于离体研究的更高分辨率技术,并且这些计算分析技术相对于金标准micro-CT的验证一直不一致且不完整。在此,我们回顾了骨腔室和微观结构的分割方法、骨形态的量化以及使用有限元分析估计机械强度的方法,强调了整个领域改进标准化的必要性。研究依赖于同质数据集进行验证,这使得不同方法之间无法进行可靠比较。因此,新型分割方法的适配和验证一直进展缓慢甚至不存在,尽管存在性能更好的替代方法,但大多数研究仍使用制造商的分割方法进行形态计量分析。HR-pQCT在捕获形态计量指标方面的前景准确性被研究结果之间的显著变异性所掩盖。对于有限元分析(FEA)方法,不同材料模型和FEA工具的使用导致了用HR-pQCT评估骨机械强度的能力分散。此外,将62微米HR-pQCT与金标准micro-CT进行比较的研究稀缺,使得这种成像方式的验证不完整。这篇综述表明,没有标准化,HR-pQCT的能力就无法得到充分评估。现在很明显,需要一个公开、可扩展的HR-pQCT和相应金标准micro-CT图像的异质数据集,这将使HR-pQCT用户能够对标现有和新方法,并根据手头的科学问题和数据选择最佳方法。随着HR-pQCT的最新进展,该领域必须吸取过去的经验教训,提供经过适当验证的技术,以确保HR-pQCT能够真正在患者诊断和护理中发挥价值。