Stefanowicz Sarah, Wlodarczyk Waldemar, Frosch Susanne, Zschaeck Sebastian, Troost Esther G C
OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 Dec 9;27:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.001. eCollection 2021 Mar.
To compare the dosimetric results of an study among intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) treatment techniques using a dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) approach in locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer patients.
For each of 15 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients, a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a Tomotherapy (TOMO), and an IMPT treatment plan was optimized on free-breathing treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. For the photon treatment plans, doses of 66 Gy and 51 Gy, both as SIB in 30 fractions, were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and to the planning target volume (PTV), respectively. For the proton plans, a dose prescription of 66 Gy(RBE) to the GTV and of 51 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume (CTV) was planned. For each SIB-treatment plan, doses to the targets and OARs were evaluated and statistically compared.
All treatment techniques reached the prescribed doses to the GTV and CTV or PTV. The stomach and the bowel, in particular the duodenum and the small bowel, were found to be frequently exposed to doses exceeding 50 Gy, irrespective of the treatment technique. For doses below 50 Gy, the IMPT technique was statistically significant superior to both IMRT techniques regarding decreasing dose to the OARs, volume of the bowel receiving 15 Gy ( ) was reduced for IMPT compared to VMAT ( = 0.003) and TOMO ( < 0.001).
With all photon and proton techniques investigated, the radiation dose to gastrointestinal OARs remained critical when treating patients with unresectable locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer using a dose-escalated SIB approach.
比较在局部复发或晚期胰腺癌患者中,采用剂量递增同步整合加量(SIB)方法的调强光子(IMRT)和稳健优化调强质子(IMPT)治疗技术的剂量学结果。
对15例局部晚期胰腺癌患者,在自由呼吸治疗计划计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上分别优化容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)、螺旋断层放疗(TOMO)和IMPT治疗计划。对于光子治疗计划,分别向大体肿瘤体积(GTV)和计划靶体积(PTV)处方66 Gy和51 Gy的剂量,均采用SIB方式,分30次给予。对于质子计划,计划向GTV处方66 Gy(相对生物效应,RBE)的剂量,向临床靶体积(CTV)处方51 Gy(RBE)的剂量。对每个SIB治疗计划,评估并统计比较靶区和危及器官(OAR)的剂量。
所有治疗技术均达到了向GTV和CTV或PTV处方的剂量。发现胃和肠道,尤其是十二指肠和小肠,无论采用何种治疗技术,都经常受到超过50 Gy剂量的照射。对于低于50 Gy的剂量,在降低OAR剂量方面,IMPT技术在统计学上显著优于两种IMRT技术,与VMAT相比,IMPT使接受15 Gy剂量的肠道体积减少(P = 0.003),与TOMO相比减少更明显(P < 0.001)。
在所有研究的光子和质子技术中,当采用剂量递增SIB方法治疗不可切除的局部复发或晚期胰腺癌患者时,胃肠道OAR的辐射剂量仍然是关键问题。