OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1165-0.
Neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy of non-metastasized, borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer is complex and prone to cause side-effects, e.g., in gastrointestinal organs. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables a high conformity to the targets while simultaneously sparing the normal tissue such that dose-escalation strategies come within reach. In this in silico feasibility study, we compared four IMPT planning strategies including robust multi-field optimization (rMFO) and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for dose-escalation in pancreatic cancer patients.
For six pancreatic cancer patients referred for adjuvant or primary radiochemotherapy, four rMFO-IMPT-SIB treatment plans each, consisting of two or three (non-)coplanar beam arrangements, were optimized. Dose values for both targets, i.e., the elective clinical target volume [CTV, prescribed dose D = 51Gy(RBE)] and the boost target [D = 66Gy(RBE)], for the organs at risk as well as target conformity and homogeneity indexes, derived from the dose volume histograms, were statistically compared.
All treatment plans of each strategy fulfilled the prescribed doses to the targets (D = 100%, D ≥ 95%, D ≤ 107%). No significant differences for the conformity index were found (p > 0.05), however, treatment plans with a three non-coplanar beam strategy were most homogenous to both targets (p < 0.045). The median value of all dosimetric results of the large and small bowel as well as for the liver and the spinal cord met the dose constraints with all beam arrangements. Irrespective of the planning strategies, the dose constraint for the duodenum and stomach were not met. Using the three-beam arrangements, the dose to the left kidney could be significant decreased when compared to a two-beam strategy (p < 0.045).
Based on our findings we recommend a three-beam configuration with at least one non-coplanar beam for dose-escalated SIB with rMFO-IMPT in advanced pancreatic cancer patients achieving a homogeneous dose distribution in the target while simultaneously minimizing the dose to the organs at risk. Further treatment planning studies on aspects of breathing and organ motion need to be performed.
对于非转移性、局部可切除或不可切除的局部晚期胰腺癌,新辅助放化疗较为复杂,且容易导致胃肠道等副作用。调强质子治疗(IMPT)能够实现高靶区适形度,同时保护正常组织,使剂量递增策略成为可能。在这项计算机模拟可行性研究中,我们比较了 4 种 IMPT 计划策略,包括稳健多野优化(rMFO)和胰腺癌患者的同步整合boost(SIB)剂量递增。
对 6 例接受辅助或原发放化疗的胰腺癌患者,分别优化了 4 种 rMFO-IMPT-SIB 治疗计划,每个计划由 2 个或 3 个(非)共面射束排列组成。统计比较了两个靶区(CTV,处方剂量 D = 51Gy[RBE])和危及器官的剂量值,以及剂量体积直方图导出的靶区适形性和均匀性指数。
每种策略的所有治疗计划均满足靶区的规定剂量(D = 100%,D≥95%,D≤107%)。一致性指数无显著差异(p>0.05),但三非共面射束策略的靶区均匀性最佳(p<0.045)。所有小肠、大肠、肝脏和脊髓的剂量学结果中位数均满足所有射束排列的剂量限制。无论采用何种计划策略,十二指肠和胃的剂量限制都无法满足。与两射束策略相比,采用三射束排列可显著降低左肾剂量(p<0.045)。
基于我们的发现,我们建议在局部晚期胰腺癌患者中使用 rMFO-IMPT 进行剂量递增 SIB 时,采用至少一个非共面射束的三射束配置,以实现靶区均匀剂量分布,同时最大限度地降低危及器官的剂量。需要进一步进行关于呼吸和器官运动方面的治疗计划研究。