• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进化的泥沼:(进化)心理学中的自大狂

The Clay of Evolution: Megalomania in (Evolutionary) Psychology.

作者信息

Loredo-Narciandi José Carlos, Castro-Tejerina Jorge

机构信息

Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Basic Psycology 1, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Mar;56(1):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09584-7. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-020-09584-7
PMID:33392913
Abstract

This article is an attempt to reply to a number of theoretical and epistemological issues frequently addressed in contemporary evolutionary psychology. We adopt a critical approach to both the empiricist conceit so often underlying the discipline and its core premises around the relationship between mind and biological evolution. As an alternative we take a constructivist view from which we propose to broach that relationship through the so-called Baldwin effect. That phenomenon, widely known among evolutionary biologists today, enables us to elude simplistic approaches to the problem of the relationship between psychology and evolution. It also affords a perspective for re-focusing the issues on the activity of organisms and the classic inter-connections among phylogenesis, historiogenesis and ontogenesis. The study concludes with a warning about the limitations to explanation that should be assumed by any psychological postulate with universally comprehensive pretensions, an issue evocative of the inevitable and structural crisis in which psychology should agree to transpire.

摘要

本文试图回应当代进化心理学中经常探讨的一些理论和认识论问题。我们对该学科常常隐含的经验主义自负及其围绕心智与生物进化关系的核心前提采取批判态度。作为替代,我们采取建构主义观点,据此我们提议通过所谓的鲍德温效应来探讨这种关系。这种现象如今在进化生物学家中广为人知,它使我们能够避开对心理学与进化关系问题的简单化处理方法。它还为重新聚焦于生物体的活动以及种系发生、历史发生和个体发生之间的经典相互联系提供了一个视角。该研究最后警告说,任何具有普遍全面诉求的心理学假设都应认识到解释的局限性,这一问题引发了心理学应该认同的不可避免的结构性危机。

相似文献

1
The Clay of Evolution: Megalomania in (Evolutionary) Psychology.进化的泥沼:(进化)心理学中的自大狂
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Mar;56(1):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09584-7. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move.从泥足到新心理学:开启转变
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09564-x.
3
Getting Psychology Back Onto Its Feet: the Developmental View of James Mark Baldwin.让心理学重新站稳脚跟:詹姆斯·马克·鲍德温的发展观
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):686-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09535-2.
4
Moving On Our Feet: For a Nomadic Psychology.用双脚前行:关于一种游牧心理学
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09529-0.
5
Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism.走向文化进化心理学:为什么进化方法并不意味着还原论或决定论。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Jun;55(2):225-249. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09613-z. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Psychology Today: Still in Denial, Still Outdated.《今日心理学》:仍在否认,依旧过时。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):563-571. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09534-3.
7
Searching for Models for Psychological Science: A Possible Contribution of Simulation.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09539-y.
8
The Game of Science and Puzzles of Paradigm.科学游戏与范式之谜。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):167-180. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09563-y.
9
Searching for an Integrative Theoretical Framework for Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology is Needed, But Not Sufficient.寻找心理学的综合理论框架:进化心理学是必要的,但并不充分。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):579-588. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2.
10
Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology.心理学统合理论的逐步推进。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):198-211. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09543-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.心理学:一个根基不稳的巨人。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5.
2
Crisis discussions in psychology--New historical and philosophical perspectives.心理学中的危机讨论——新的历史和哲学视角
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Jun;43(2):425-33. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
3
The dynamics of ontogeny: a neuroconstructivist perspective on genes, brains, cognition and behavior.个体发生的动力学:基因、大脑、认知和行为的神经建构主义观点。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;189:23-33. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53884-0.00016-6.
4
Constructivisms from a genetic point of view: a critical classification of current tendencies.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2009 Dec;43(4):332-49. doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9091-1.
5
The neural basis of cognitive development: a constructivist manifesto.
Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Dec;20(4):537-56; discussion 556-96. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x97001581.