Clinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 May;23(5):1101-1110. doi: 10.1111/dom.14313. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
To provide evidence on the cardiovascular and renal safety of metformin in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 to 4.
This post hoc analysis compared participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73m in the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) and the Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trials taking metformin, with those not exposed to metformin during these trials, using a propensity-matching approach. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM). Metformin effect on eGFR slope was calculated using a mixed-model repeated measures analysis, and the number of lactic acidosis events was tabulated.
No strong trend for lower metformin doses with lower eGFR values was observed in either the EXSCEL or SAVOR-TIMI 53 trials. In the 1745 metformin-using participants matched to non-metformin users, metformin had neutral effects on MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.08; P = 0.28) and ACM (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70-1.07; P = 0.18), with no interaction by CKD stage, or with use of exenatide or saxagliptin. An improvement in eGFR slope was observed with metformin in the CKD stage 3B cohort in SAVOR-TIMI 53, but not in other groups.
This analysis of participants with CKD stages 3 to 4 from two cardiovascular outcomes trials supports the cardiorenal safety of metformin, but does not suggest a consistent benefit on MACE, ACM, or eGFR slope across this population.
为慢性肾脏病(CKD)3 至 4 期的二甲双胍心血管和肾脏安全性提供证据。
这项事后分析比较了 EXSCEL 和 SAVOR-TIMI 53 试验中估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为 15 至 59ml/min/1.73m2 的参与者,这些参与者接受二甲双胍治疗,以及在这些试验中未接受二甲双胍治疗的参与者,使用倾向匹配方法。使用调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型评估主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和全因死亡率(ACM)的风险。使用混合模型重复测量分析计算二甲双胍对 eGFR 斜率的影响,并列出乳酸酸中毒事件的数量。
在 EXSCEL 或 SAVOR-TIMI 53 试验中,均未观察到随着 eGFR 值降低而出现二甲双胍剂量降低的明显趋势。在与非二甲双胍使用者匹配的 1745 名二甲双胍使用者中,二甲双胍对 MACE(风险比[HR]0.91,95%置信区间[CI]0.76-1.08;P=0.28)和 ACM(HR 0.86,95%CI 0.70-1.07;P=0.18)的影响为中性,与 CKD 分期、恩格列净或沙格列汀的使用均无交互作用。在 SAVOR-TIMI 53 中,观察到 CKD 3B 队列中二甲双胍的 eGFR 斜率改善,但在其他组中则不然。
这项来自两项心血管结局试验的 CKD 3 至 4 期患者分析支持二甲双胍的心脏肾脏安全性,但不能证明在该人群中,二甲双胍在 MACE、ACM 或 eGFR 斜率方面具有一致的益处。