Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany.
J Glaucoma. 2021 Apr 1;30(4):340-346. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001775.
To compare the efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation applied at the level of the pars plicata transscleral micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (PLI-MPC) versus the pars plana transscleral micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (PLA-MPC).
This prospective interventional case series included 44 eyes of 31 medically treated primary open-angle glaucoma patients scheduled for micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation to achieve further intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. In total, 22 eyes underwent PLI-MPC and PLA-MPC each. Primary endpoints were the reduction of 24-hour mean diurnal IOP (mean of 6 measurements), diurnal IOP fluctuations, and peak IOP, after 3 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, a possible deterioration in visual acuity and field, factors influencing IOP reduction, and the number of dropouts.
In the PLI-MPC group, IOP was reduced from 15.9±3.4 mm Hg to 13.6±3.1 mm Hg (n=16; P<0.001) and 12.9±3.7 mm Hg (n=13; P<0.001) at 3 and 12-month follow-up. In the PLA-MPC group, IOP decreased from 16.4±3.5 mm Hg to 12.3±2.6 mm Hg (n=15; P<0.001) and 11.8±2.2 mm Hg (n=14; P<0.001), respectively. At 12 months, 59% of the PLI-MPC and 63% of the PLA-MPC group had a sufficient IOP reduction to reach the individual target pressure. No complications were seen in either group. A higher preoperative IOP was recognized as the only factor influencing the postoperative IOP reduction.
PLI-MPC and PLA-MPC seem to be safe and effective in further lowering the IOP in about 60% of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma who did not reach target pressure despite maximally tolerated IOP-lowering medication. Although the IOP-lowering effect was not statistically significantly different between groups the pars plicata application was superior and easier to perform and should be recommended as the preferred method of application.
比较睫状体扁平部经巩膜微脉冲光睫状体光凝术(PLI-MPC)与睫状体平坦部经巩膜微脉冲光睫状体光凝术(PLA-MPC)治疗原发性开角型青光眼的疗效和安全性。
这是一项前瞻性的干预性病例系列研究,纳入了 31 名接受药物治疗的原发性开角型青光眼患者的 44 只眼,这些患者计划接受微脉冲经巩膜睫状体光凝术以进一步降低眼内压(IOP)。共有 22 只眼分别接受了 PLI-MPC 和 PLA-MPC。主要终点是术后 3 个月和 12 个月时 24 小时平均日间 IOP(6 次测量的平均值)、日间 IOP 波动和最高 IOP 的降低。次要结局是术后并发症、视力和视野可能恶化、影响 IOP 降低的因素以及脱落人数。
在 PLI-MPC 组,16 只眼的 IOP 从 15.9±3.4mmHg 降低至 13.6±3.1mmHg(n=16;P<0.001)和 12.9±3.7mmHg(n=13;P<0.001),13 只眼的 IOP 从 16.4±3.5mmHg 降低至 12.3±2.6mmHg(n=15;P<0.001)和 11.8±2.2mmHg(n=14;P<0.001)。在 12 个月时,59%的 PLI-MPC 组和 63%的 PLA-MPC 组患者的 IOP 降低幅度足以达到个体目标压力。两组均未出现并发症。术前较高的 IOP 被认为是唯一影响术后 IOP 降低的因素。
对于未达到目标眼压的原发性开角型青光眼患者,尽管接受了最大限度耐受的降眼压药物治疗,PLI-MPC 和 PLA-MPC 似乎是安全有效的,可以进一步降低约 60%患者的眼压。尽管两组之间的 IOP 降低效果没有统计学上的显著差异,但睫状体扁平部应用效果更好,且更容易操作,应作为首选应用方法。