• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服和/或静脉注射替地唑膦酸在青少年急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的随机 3 期临床试验中的安全性和疗效。

Safety and Efficacy of Oral and/or Intravenous Tedizolid Phosphate From a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Adolescents With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

机构信息

From the Merck Research Laboratories, Rady Children's Hospital/UCSD, San Diego, CA.

Merck Research Laboratories, LTD M. Iashvili Children's Central Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Mar 1;40(3):238-244. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003010.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000003010
PMID:33395210
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tedizolid phosphate is an oxazolidinone prodrug approved in 2014 for treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs); however, efficacy has not previously been evaluated in children. This study compared the safety and efficacy of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) with active antibacterial comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents.

METHODS

This was a randomized, assessor-blind, global phase 3 study of tedizolid versus active comparators for the treatment of Gram-positive ABSSSIs in adolescents (12 to <18 years of age; NCT02276482). Enrolled participants were stratified by region and randomized 3:1 to receive tedizolid phosphate 200 mg (oral and/or intravenous) once daily for 6 days or active comparator, selected by investigator from an allowed list per local standard of care, for 10 days. The primary endpoint was safety; blinded investigator's assessment of clinical success at the test-of-cure visit (18-25 days after the first dose) was a secondary efficacy endpoint. Statistical comparisons between treatment groups were not performed.

RESULTS

Of the 121 participants enrolled, 120 were treated (tedizolid, n = 91; comparator, n = 29). Treatment-emergent adverse events were balanced between treatment groups (tedizolid, 14.3%; comparator, 10.3%). Overall, 3 participants (3.3%) in the tedizolid group and 1 (3.4%) in the comparator group experienced a single drug-related TEAE. Clinical success rates were high in both treatment groups: 96.7% and 93.1% at the test-of-cure visit for the tedizolid and comparator groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tedizolid demonstrated safety and efficacy similar to comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents.

摘要

背景

替加环素磷酸盐是一种噁唑烷酮类前药,于 2014 年获批用于治疗成人急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs);然而,此前尚未在儿童中评估其疗效。本研究比较了替加环素(作为替加环素磷酸盐给药)与活性抗菌对照药物治疗青少年 ABSSSIs 的安全性和疗效。

方法

这是一项在全球范围内进行的、随机、评估者盲法的 3 期研究,比较了替加环素与活性对照药物治疗青少年(12 至<18 岁;NCT02276482)革兰阳性 ABSSSIs 的疗效。入组患者按地区分层,按 3:1 的比例随机分组,分别接受替加环素磷酸盐 200mg(口服和/或静脉注射),每日 1 次,连用 6 天,或研究者根据当地标准护理的允许清单选择活性对照药物,连用 10 天。主要终点为安全性;治疗结束时(首次给药后 18-25 天)盲法评估临床疗效为次要疗效终点。未对治疗组间进行统计学比较。

结果

在 121 名入组患者中,120 名患者接受了治疗(替加环素组,n=91;对照组,n=29)。治疗期间不良事件在两组间均衡(替加环素组,14.3%;对照组,10.3%)。替加环素组和对照组各有 3 名(3.3%)和 1 名(3.4%)患者发生 1 例药物相关的治疗期间不良事件。两组的临床治愈率均较高:替加环素组和对照组在治疗结束时的临床治愈率分别为 96.7%和 93.1%。

结论

替加环素治疗青少年 ABSSSIs 的安全性和疗效与对照药物相似。

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Oral and/or Intravenous Tedizolid Phosphate From a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Adolescents With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.口服和/或静脉注射替地唑膦酸在青少年急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的随机 3 期临床试验中的安全性和疗效。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Mar 1;40(3):238-244. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003010.
2
Population Pharmacokinetics, Exposure-Response, and Probability of Target Attainment Analyses for Tedizolid in Adolescent Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.泰地唑胺治疗青少年急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的群体药代动力学、暴露-反应和目标达成概率分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Nov 17;65(12):e0089521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00895-21. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.替考拉宁治疗 6 天与利奈唑胺治疗 10 天治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ESTABLISH-2):一项随机、双盲、III 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):696-705. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70737-6. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
4
Tedizolid: a novel oxazolidinone with potent activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.替考拉宁:一种新型噁唑烷酮类药物,对多种耐药革兰阳性病原体具有强大的活性。
Drugs. 2015 Feb;75(3):253-70. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0352-7.
5
Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial.磷酸替加环素与利奈唑胺治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染:ESTABLISH-1 随机试验。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.241.
6
Tedizolid and Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections of the Lower Extremity versus Non-Lower-Extremity Infections.替加环素与利奈唑胺治疗下肢急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染与非下肢感染的比较
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 Jul;107(4):264-271. doi: 10.7547/15-218. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of tedizolid versus linezolid in patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Japan - Results of a randomised, multicentre phase 3 study.替加环素与利奈唑胺治疗日本皮肤和软组织感染患者的疗效、安全性及药代动力学——一项随机、多中心3期研究的结果
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Jun;24(6):434-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
Comparison of the microbiological efficacy of tedizolid and linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: pooled data from phase 3 clinical trials.替加环素与利奈唑胺治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的微生物疗效比较:来自 3 期临床试验的汇总数据。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;94(3):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.替加环素与利奈唑胺治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的3期ESTABLISH试验分析
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):864-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03688-14. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Platelet profile in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections receiving tedizolid or linezolid: findings from the Phase 3 ESTABLISH clinical trials.接受特地唑胺或利奈唑胺治疗的急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的血小板情况:3期ESTABLISH临床试验结果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7198-204. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03509-14. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Landscape of Post-Marketing Requirements Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act for Antibiotics from 2009-2024.2009年至2024年《儿科研究公平法案》下抗生素上市后要求的概况
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;14(6):583. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14060583.
2
A Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tedizolid Phosphate in Patients <12 Years of Age With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.一项关于磷酸泰地唑胺治疗12岁以下急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者安全性和有效性的3期研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025 Jun 1;44(6):533-538. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004807. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
Therapeutic Options and Outcomes for the Treatment of Children with Gram-Positive Bacteria with Resistances of Concern: A Systematic Review.
治疗对关注的革兰氏阳性菌具有耐药性的儿童的治疗选择和结果:一项系统评价
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;12(2):261. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020261.
4
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid.替加环素的药代动力学和药效学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01099-7. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Population Pharmacokinetics, Exposure-Response, and Probability of Target Attainment Analyses for Tedizolid in Adolescent Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.泰地唑胺治疗青少年急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的群体药代动力学、暴露-反应和目标达成概率分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Nov 17;65(12):e0089521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00895-21. Epub 2021 Sep 13.