Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2022 Jul-Sep;11(3):391-399. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2020.1862656. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity levels of BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests applied to children with developmental dyslexia and to examine their clinical usability. This study was designed as a case-controlled study. 82 (study group 41, control group 41) 7-12 year children were included. The study occurred three stages. In the first place, the similarities and differences of BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests observed in clinical practices were examined by taking the feedback of experts and test correlations. In the second step, BOT2-BF and BOT2-SF tests were examined with reference to the Core Outcome Set (COS) evaluation criteria. In the last step, in order to examine the sensitivity and specificity levels of the tests, assessments were performed in two groups with 1-week intervals. According to the COS results, the BOT2-BF test was examined better than the BOT2-SF test under cross-cultural validity title. The sensitivity and specificity of BOT2-SF were 0.92 and 0.51, and for BOT2-BF were 0.92 and 0.41, respectively. This study will help clinicians working on children with developmental dyslexia to decide the type of test they will use to evaluate and easy access to materials motor proficiency.
本研究旨在确定 BOT2-BF 和 BOT2-SF 测试在发育性阅读障碍儿童中的敏感性和特异性水平，并检验其临床实用性。本研究设计为病例对照研究。共纳入 82 名（研究组 41 名，对照组 41 名）7-12 岁儿童。研究分为三个阶段。首先，通过征求专家意见和测试相关性，检查 BOT2-BF 和 BOT2-SF 测试在临床实践中的异同。其次，根据核心结局集（COS）评估标准检查 BOT2-BF 和 BOT2-SF 测试。最后，为了检验测试的敏感性和特异性水平，在两周的时间间隔内对两组进行评估。根据 COS 结果，在跨文化有效性标题下，BOT2-BF 测试的检查结果优于 BOT2-SF 测试。BOT2-SF 的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.92 和 0.51，BOT2-BF 分别为 0.92 和 0.41。本研究将有助于从事发育性阅读障碍儿童工作的临床医生决定他们将用于评估和方便获取运动技能材料的测试类型。
