Rao Nithya M, Yi Shangwen, Yu Diane, Husain Kaab, Sun Yicong, Munawar Maaz, Hernandez Valeria, Kamble Shanmukh V, Chang Edward C
University of Michigan.
University of British Columbia.
J Gen Psychol. 2022 Jul-Sep;149(3):391-404. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1867495. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
The present study examined the role of optimism, as measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised, and coping styles, as measured by the COPE scale, in predicting negative affective conditions (viz., depressive symptoms, stress, and negative affect) among 386 Asian Indian young adults (197 females and 189 males). Results from our hierarchical regression analyses indicated that coping styles accounted for a medium-large amount of variance in negative affective conditions, after controlling for demographic factors (i.e. age, gender, parent's education, and monthly income). Five coping styles were significant in predicting negative affective conditions across all three indices; mental disengagement, denial, and venting emotions were found to be maladaptive, while positive reinterpretation and humor were found to be adaptive among Asian Indian young adults. Furthermore, when optimism was included in the prediction model, optimism consistently accounted for additional variance in negative affective conditions, beyond coping styles. Due to the additional variance among negative affective conditions accounted for by optimism when compared to coping, we advise that mental health professionals consider prioritizing the reinforcement of positive expectancy in addition to enhancing adaptive coping styles and reducing the use of maladaptive coping among Asian Indians.
本研究通过修订的生活取向测试来衡量乐观主义,通过应对方式量表来衡量应对方式,以考察其在预测386名亚洲印度年轻人(197名女性和189名男性)的负面情绪状况(即抑郁症状、压力和负面情绪)中的作用。我们的分层回归分析结果表明,在控制人口统计学因素(即年龄、性别、父母教育程度和月收入)后,应对方式在负面情绪状况中解释了中到大量的方差。五种应对方式在预测所有三个指标的负面情绪状况时具有显著性;在亚洲印度年轻人中,心理脱离、否认和发泄情绪被发现是适应不良的,而积极重新解释和幽默则被发现是适应性的。此外,当乐观主义被纳入预测模型时,乐观主义始终在应对方式之外,解释了负面情绪状况中的额外方差。由于与应对方式相比,乐观主义在负面情绪状况中解释了额外的方差,我们建议心理健康专业人员除了增强适应性应对方式和减少亚洲印度人使用适应不良的应对方式外,还应考虑优先强化积极预期。